Literature DB >> 15082012

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

A Karim Touijer1, Bertrand Guillonneau.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a relatively new approach to the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer. Since its inception, the technique, however challenging, is undergoing continuous refinements which make it today a feasible, reproducible, and teachable operation practiced by urologists worldwide. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach are a magnified view of the anatomic structures, and a decreased venous bleeding in the surgical field allowing an accurate dissection of the prostate and neurovascular bundles. These advantages translate to a low positive surgical margin rate, low morbidity profile, and favorable postoperative quality of life outcomes. However, since the technique has only been performed for the past 6 years, long term cancer control and functional results data following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy are not available. For a successful laparoscopic prostatectomy program, advanced laparoscopic skills, knowledge of the prostatic anatomy, and expertise in surgical oncology are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082012     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  7 in total

1.  Detrusor underactivity is prevalent after radical prostatectomy: A urodynamic study including risk factors.

Authors:  Doreen E Chung; Benjamin Dillon; Jordan Kurta; Alexandra Maschino; Angel Cronin; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; James A Eastham; Fernando P Secin; Javier Romero Otero; Angel Serio; Jason Stasi; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Fernando P Secin; Angel M Cronin; Darren Katz; Fernando Bianco; Kinjal Vora; Victor Reuter; Andrew J Vickers; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Functional Preservation and Oncologic Control following Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Ru Chen; Ke Zhu; Xiaofeng Cheng; Yunqiang Xiong; Weipeng Liu; Cheng Zhang; Yulei Li; Hao Jiang; Xiaochen Zhou; Ting Sun; Luyao Chen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Gongxian Wang; Bin Fu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.375

5.  Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer With a Large Prostate Volume: A Retrospective Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Ups.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Xiaoqiang Liu; Weipeng Liu; Cheng Zhang; Xiaochen Zhou; Luyao Chen; Ju Guo; Gongxian Wang; Bin Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ralph Madeb; Dragan Golijanin; Joy Knopf; Ivelisse Vicente; Erdal Erturk; Hitendra R H Patel; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ralph Madeb; Dragan Golijanin; Joy Knopf; Ivelisse Vicente; Erdal Erturk; Hitendra R H Patel; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.