Literature DB >> 15081554

Synthesis and evaluation of HEMA-free glass-ionomer cements for dental applications.

Dong Xie1, Il-Doo Chung, Wei Wu, Jimmy Mays.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to synthesize and characterize amino acid acrylate and methacrylate derivatives, use them to formulate light-cured glass-ionomer cements (LCGICs), and evaluate their mechanical strengths.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acrylate and methacrylate derivatives of six amino acids were synthesized and characterized using FT-IR and 1HNMR spectroscopy. The LCGICs were formulated using a newly synthesized polymer having pendant methacrylate groups (in other words, a methacryloyl derived polymer or MDP), amino acid derivatives, water, and Fuji II LC glass. Compressive strength of the cements and viscosities of the resin liquids were used as screening tools in order to determine the optimal formulation. The specimens were conditioned in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h prior to testing.
RESULTS: The measured compressive strengths (MPa) of the cements were found to depend on the amino acid derivative used: acryloyl aspartic acid (268.5) > methacryloyl beta-alanine (259.1) = methacryloyl glutamic acid (254.5) = acryloyl beta-alanine (251.9) > acryloyl glutamic acid (238.8) > methacryloyl aspartic acid (210.9). Methacryloyl beta-alanine (MBA) was selected for further formulations due to its relatively low solution viscosity and high compressive strength. Effects of MDP content and power/liquid (P/L) ratio were significant. The formulation with a liquid composition of 50/25/25 (MDP/MBA/water) and P/L ratio of 2.7/1 was found to give optimal properties and handling of all the formulations studied.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel HEMA-free LCGIC system based on amino acid derivatives has been developed. This system may eliminate potential cytotoxicity in current LCGICs caused by leached 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). The optimal MBA-modified cements were 20% higher in compressive strength, 70% higher in diametral tensile strength (DTS) and 93% higher in flexure strength (FS), as compared to Fuji II LC cement. Copyright 2003 Academy of Dental Materials

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15081554     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Zinc-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Ionomer Type IX Cement: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Krishna Patil; Alok Patel; Sanket Kunte; Preetam Shah; Buneet Kaur; Sujatha Paranna
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

2.  A novel light-cured glass-ionomer system for improved dental restoratives.

Authors:  Dong Xie; Jun Zhao; Jong-Gu Park
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Rheological Properties, Surface Microhardness, and Dentin Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Methacrylate-Functionalized Polyacids and Spherical Pre-Reacted Glass Fillers.

Authors:  Whithipa Thepveera; Wisitsin Potiprapanpong; Arnit Toneluck; Somruethai Channasanon; Chutikarn Khamsuk; Naruporn Monmaturapoj; Siriporn Tanodekaew; Piyaphong Panpisut
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14

4.  The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.

Authors:  Gilliard Lima Oliveira; Ceci Nunes Carvalho; Edilausson Moreno Carvalho; José Bauer; Adriana Mara Araújo Leal
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-09-15

Review 5.  The Benefits of Smart Nanoparticles in Dental Applications.

Authors:  Silvia Vasiliu; Stefania Racovita; Ionela Aurica Gugoasa; Maria-Andreea Lungan; Marcel Popa; Jacques Desbrieres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.