Literature DB >> 15080775

Remission criteria for the follow-up of patients with acromegaly.

Sevim Gullu1, Hatice Keles, Tuncay Delibasi, Vedia Tonyukuk, Nuri Kamel, Gurbuz Erdogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the validity of current remission criteria in acromegaly, a random GH level of <2.5 microg/l, a glucose-suppressed GH level of <1 microg/l and a normal IGF-I level.
DESIGN: In forty-one patients treated for acromegaly (23 males and 18 females, 20-69 years) and 94 healthy subjects (50 males and 44 females, 20-78 years), basal GH and IGF-I levels and nadir GH levels after 75 g oral glucose were evaluated in decade blocks; these were assayed by sensitive immunoradiometric assays.
RESULTS: Basal GH levels varied widely from 0.022 to 10.4 in healthy subjects and were >2.5 microg/l in 19%. The mean post-glucose GH nadir was 0.067+/-0.009 microg/l (range 0.003-0.4 microg/l) and the upper limit of the GH nadir was 0.26 microg/l (means+2 S.D.) in healthy subjects. Thirty-five patients with acromegaly had high-for-age IGF-I levels in relation to our healthy subjects. In this group, 15 (42.9%) patients had basal GH levels of <2.5 microg/l, 14 (40%) patients had nadir GH levels of <1 microg/l, and three (8.6%) patients had GH suppression to <0.26 microg/l which was defined as normal GH suppression in our healthy subjects. Only six patients with acromegaly had normal-for-age IGF-I levels and all of these patients had basal GH levels of <2.5 microg/l and all but one had nadir GH levels of <0.26 microg/l.
CONCLUSIONS: A basal or random GH level of <2.5 microg/l is not a reliable criterion for remission in acromegaly and the currently accepted normal upper limit of 1 microg/l for post-glucose GH suppression is too high. Post-glucose nadir GH levels, measured with sensitive assays, can be <1.0 microg/l in 40% and basal GH levels can be <2.5 microg/l in 43% of the active acromegalic patients. IGF-I levels appeared to correlate better with a nadir GH cut-off of 0.26 microg/l rather than 1 microg/l in the determination of disease activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15080775     DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1500465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  10 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of acromegaly: future.

Authors:  Ines Donangelo; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Assessment of biochemical control of acromegaly during treatment with somatostatin analogues by oral glucose load and insulin-like growth factor I.

Authors:  M Scacchi; C Carzaniga; G Vitale; L M Fatti; F Pecori Giraldi; M Andrioli; A Cattaneo; F Cavagnini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Acromegaly.

Authors:  Massimo Scacchi; Francesco Cavagnini
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  The coexistence of an intrasellar adenoma, lymphocytic hypophysitis, and primary pituitary lymphoma in a patient with acromegaly.

Authors:  Jose Hernan Martinez; Mariel Davila Martinez; Marcos Mercado de Gorgola; Luis F Montalvo; Jaime E Tome
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2011-10-26

Review 7.  Serum IGF-I levels in the diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly.

Authors:  A M Brooke; W M Drake
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Medical therapy of acromegaly.

Authors:  U Plöckinger
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Mean GH profile is more accurate than single fasting GH in the evaluation of acromegaly disease control during somatostatin receptor ligands therapy.

Authors:  C Bona; N Prencipe; A M Berton; F Bioletto; M Parasiliti-Caprino; V Gasco; E Ghigo; S Grottoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.467

10.  Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes A Romijn
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.