Literature DB >> 15078141

A systematic approach to simulating metabolism in computational toxicology. I. The TIMES heuristic modelling framework.

Ovanes G Mekenyan1, Sabcho D Dimitrov, Todor S Pavlov, Gilman D Veith.   

Abstract

Designing biologically active chemicals and managing their risks requires a holistic perspective on the chemical-biological interactions that form the basis of selective toxicity. The balance of therapeutic and adverse outcomes for new drugs and pesticides is managed by shaping the probabilities for transport, metabolism, and molecular initiating events. For chemicals activated as well as detoxified by metabolism, selective toxicity may be considered in terms of relative probabilities, which shift dramatically across species as well as within a population, depending on many factors. The complexity in toxicology that results from metabolism has been troublesome in QSAR research because the parent structure is less relevant to predicting ultimate effects and finding reference species/conditions for metabolic rates seems hopeless. Even the complexity of comparative xenobiotic metabolism itself seems paradoxical in light of the evidence of highly conserved catabolic processes across species. Clearly, predicting the role of metabolism in selective toxicity and adverse health outcomes requires a probabilistic framework for deterministic models as well as the many factors shaping the metabolic probability distributions under specific conditions. This paper presents a tissue metabolism simulator (TIMES), which uses a heuristic algorithm to generate plausible metabolic maps from a comprehensive library of biotransformations and abiotic reactions and estimates for system-specific transformation probabilities. The transformation probabilities can be calibrated to specific reference conditions using transformation rate information from systematic testing. In the absence of rate data, a combinatorial algorithm is used to translate known metabolic maps taken from reference systems into best-fit transformation probabilities. Finally, toxicity test data itself can be used to shape the transformation probabilities for toxicity pathways in which the metabolic activation is the rate-limiting process leading to a toxic effect. The conceptual approach for metabolic simulation will be presented along with practical uses in forecasting plausible activated metabolites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15078141     DOI: 10.2174/1381612043452596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Des        ISSN: 1381-6128            Impact factor:   3.116


  14 in total

1.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?

Authors:  Artem Cherkasov; Eugene N Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Igor I Baskin; Mark Cronin; John Dearden; Paola Gramatica; Yvonne C Martin; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Victor E Kuz'min; Richard Cramer; Romualdo Benigni; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Lothar Terfloth; Johann Gasteiger; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

4.  Comparing the performance and coverage of selected in silico (liver) metabolism tools relative to reported studies in the literature to inform analogue selection in read-across: A case study.

Authors:  Matthew Boyce; Brian Meyer; Chris Grulke; Lucina Lizarraga; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Evaluation of Existing QSAR Models and Structural Alerts and Development of New Ensemble Models for Genotoxicity Using a Newly Compiled Experimental Dataset.

Authors:  Prachi Pradeep; Richard Judson; David M DeMarini; Nagalakshmi Keshava; Todd M Martin; Jeffry Dean; Catherine F Gibbons; Anita Simha; Sarah H Warren; Maureen R Gwinn; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-01

6.  NICEdrug.ch, a workflow for rational drug design and systems-level analysis of drug metabolism.

Authors:  Anush Chiappino-Pepe; Kiandokht Haddadi; Homa MohammadiPeyhani; Jasmin Hafner; Noushin Hadadi; Vassily Hatzimanikatis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Computational prediction of metabolism: sites, products, SAR, P450 enzyme dynamics, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Mark J Williamson; Jonathan D Tyzack; Lu Tan; Peter J Bond; Andreas Bender; Robert C Glen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Computational tools and resources for metabolism-related property predictions. 1. Overview of publicly available (free and commercial) databases and software.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Alexey V Zakharov; Ruifeng Liu; Angelo Pugliese; Gregory Tawa; Anders Wallqvist; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.808

9.  Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity (KATE) system, March 2009 version.

Authors:  A Furuhama; T Toida; N Nishikawa; Y Aoki; Y Yoshioka; H Shiraishi
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.

Authors:  Martyn T Smith; Kathryn Z Guyton; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Alexandre Borrel; Andres Cardenas; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dean W Felsher; Catherine F Gibbons; William H Goodson; Keith A Houck; Agnes B Kane; Michele A La Merrill; Herve Lebrec; Leroy Lowe; Cliona M McHale; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Linda Rieswijk; Martha S Sandy; Hideko Sone; Amy Wang; Luoping Zhang; Lauren Zeise; Mark Fielden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.