Literature DB >> 15077813

The effect of killed Salmonella enteritidis vaccine prior to induced molting on the shedding of s. enteritidis in laying hens.

Masayuki Nakamura1, Tomoshi Nagata, Shizuka Okamura, Kazuaki Takehara, Peter S Holt.   

Abstract

Effects of administering killed Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis (SE) vaccines to laying hens prior to induced molting on egg production and on shedding of SE were investigated. Forty hens were vaccinated with one of two SE vaccines available commercially in the United States and Japan. Twenty-five days after vaccination, feed was withdrawn for 2 wk from 20 vaccinated plus 10 unvaccinated hens to induce molt. Four days after molt induction, all hens were challenged with a dose of 2.4 X 10(9) of SE. For the 25 days following administration of the SE bacterins, egg production in vaccinated hens showed approximately a 15% decrease. After molt induction, egg production in molted hens ceased and then returned to normal levels 8 or 9 wk postvaccination. Through the 3-mo experimental period, the decreases in numbers of eggs laid in the unvaccinated/molted group and two vaccinated/molted groups were 225 (26.2%), 245 (28.4%), and 274 (31.9%), respectively, compared with 860 in the unvaccinated/unmolted group. There was no significant difference in egg lay at the P < 0.05 level among the former three groups. Hens in the vaccinated/molted groups shed about two logs less SE than hens in the unvaccinated/molted group 3 14 days postchallenge (P < 0.05 or 0.01). These results indicate that vaccination prior to induced molting might be effective in preventing the exacerbation of SE problems within flocks in which the potential for SE contamination may exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15077813     DOI: 10.1637/7040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  5 in total

1.  Immune response following vaccination against Salmonella Enteritidis using 2 commercial bacterins in laying hens.

Authors:  Thi Q L Tran; Sylvain Quessy; Ann Letellier; Annie Desrosiers; Martine Boulianne
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Observations related to the Salmonella EU layer baseline survey in the United Kingdom: follow-up of positive flocks and sensitivity issues.

Authors:  J J Carrique-Mas; M Breslin; L Snow; M E Arnold; A Wales; I McLaren; R H Davies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Effect of Salmonella vaccination of breeder chickens on contamination of broiler chicken carcasses in integrated poultry operations.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Dana J Cole; Charles Hofacre; Katherine Zamperini; Demetrius Mathis; Michael P Doyle; Margie D Lee; John J Maurer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Part 1: challenges and needs.

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Lisa Bielke; Damer P Blake; Eric Cox; Simon M Cutting; Bert Devriendt; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel; Evy Goossens; Kemal Karaca; Stephane Lemiere; Martin Metzner; Margot Raicek; Miquel Collell Suriñach; Nora M Wong; Cyril Gay; Filip Van Immerseel
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Public health assessment of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis inactivated-vaccine treatment in layer flocks.

Authors:  Yukiko Toyota-Hanatani; Tomoya Ekawa; Hiroaki Ohta; Shizunobu Igimi; Yukiko Hara-Kudo; Kazumi Sasai; Eiichiroh Baba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.