Literature DB >> 15077808

Detection of airborne Salmonella enteritidis in the environment of experimentally infected laying hens by an electrostatic sampling device.

Richard K Gast1, Bailey W Mitchell, Peter S Holt.   

Abstract

Bacteriologic culturing of environmental samples taken from sources such as manure pits and egg belts has been the principal screening tool in programs for identifying commercial laying flocks that have been exposed to Salmonella enteritidis and are thus at risk to produce contaminated eggs. Because airborne dust and aerosols can carry bacteria, air sampling offers a potentially efficient and inexpensive alternative for detecting S. enteritidis in poultry house environments. In the present study, an electrostatic air sampling device was applied to detect S. enteritidis in a room containing experimentally infected, caged laying hens. After oral inoculation of hens with a phage type 13a S. enteritidis strain, air samples were collected onto agar plates with the electrostatic sampling device, an impaction air sampler, and by passive exposure to the settling of aerosols and dust. Even though the floor of the room was cleaned once per week (removing most manure, dust, and feathers), air samples were positive for S. enteritidis for up to 4 wk postinoculation. On the basis of both the number of S. enteritidis colonies observed on incubated agar plates and the frequency of positive results, the efficiency of the electrostatic device was significantly greater than that of the passive exposure plates (especially at short collection intervals) and was similar to that of the far more expensive impaction sampler. The electrostatic device, used for a 3-hr sampling interval, detected airborne S. enteritidis on 75% of agar plates over the 4 wk of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15077808     DOI: 10.1637/7086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  6 in total

Review 1.  Raising chickens in city backyards: the public health role.

Authors:  S L Pollock; C Stephen; N Skuridina; T Kosatsky
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

2.  Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.809

3.  Mechanically ventilated broiler sheds: a possible source of aerosolized Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; T Tran; L Maddock; A Gale; P J Blackall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Active microorganisms thrive among extremely diverse communities in cloud water.

Authors:  Pierre Amato; Muriel Joly; Ludovic Besaury; Anne Oudart; Najwa Taib; Anne I Moné; Laurent Deguillaume; Anne-Marie Delort; Didier Debroas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Role of indoor aerosols for COVID-19 viral transmission: a review.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Puqi Jia; Jie Han
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 9.027

6.  Evaluation of the respiratory route as a viable portal of entry for Salmonella in poultry via intratracheal challenge of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium.

Authors:  G Kallapura; M J Morgan; N R Pumford; L R Bielke; A D Wolfenden; O B Faulkner; J D Latorre; A Menconi; X Hernandez-Velasco; V A Kuttappan; B M Hargis; G Tellez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.