OBJECTIVE: The novel antihypertensive agent, omapatrilat, is both an inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme. This study investigated the effects of omapatrilat in comparison with an angiotensin I-receptor antagonist/diuretic combination on blood pressure, endothelial function and cardiac hypertrophy in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). METHODS: Male and female SHRSP were treated orally with omapatrilat or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (I + H) or vehicle for 8 weeks. Systolic blood pressure was measured weekly by tail-cuff. Cardiac hypertrophy was monitored by echocardiography at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. Endothelial function [basal nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and stimulated NO release] was examined in carotid arteries using organ bath pharmacology and in mesenteric resistance arteries using wire myography. RESULTS: Compared with untreated controls, omapatrilat and I + H significantly attenuated hypertension [male control, 198.3 +/- 6.9 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 149.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg (F = 8.63 P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 145.6 +/- 5.1 mmHg (F = 7.38 P < 0.0001); female control, 170.3 +/-8.3 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 120.0 +/- 4.6 mmHg (F = 8.36, P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 112.2 +/- 2.9 mmHg (F = 9.08, P < 0.0001)] and left ventricular hypertrophy [male + female controls, 3.02 +/- 0.38 mg/g versus omapatrilat, 2.47 +/- 0.26 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.27, 0.83), versus I + H, 2.49 +/- 0.21 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.25, 0.83)]. Both treatments also significantly increased male carotid artery basal NO bioavailability relative to control [control, 0.62 +/- 0.17 g/g versus omapatrilat, 1.95 +/- 0.17 g/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, -1.83, -0.36), versus I + H, 1.57 +/- 0.21 g/g (P < 0.026; 95% confidence interval, -1.31, -0.12)]. However, stimulated NO (EC50) was only improved in omapatrilat-treated males [controls, 0.19 +/- 0.06 micromol/l versus omapatrilat, 0.05 +/- 0.01 micromol/l (P = 0.05; 95% confidence interval, -1.16, -0.03)]. CONCLUSIONS: Omapatrilat treatment significantly reduced left ventricular hypertrophy and improved endothelial function in carotid arteries from male SHRSP by NO-dependent mechanisms. Despite equivalent antihypertensive and antihypertrophic actions, a similar improvement in endothelial function, specifically stimulated NO release, was not observed after treatment with I + H.
OBJECTIVE: The novel antihypertensive agent, omapatrilat, is both an inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme. This study investigated the effects of omapatrilat in comparison with an angiotensin I-receptor antagonist/diuretic combination on blood pressure, endothelial function and cardiac hypertrophy in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensiverats (SHRSP). METHODS: Male and female SHRSP were treated orally with omapatrilat or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (I + H) or vehicle for 8 weeks. Systolic blood pressure was measured weekly by tail-cuff. Cardiac hypertrophy was monitored by echocardiography at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. Endothelial function [basal nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and stimulated NO release] was examined in carotid arteries using organ bath pharmacology and in mesenteric resistance arteries using wire myography. RESULTS: Compared with untreated controls, omapatrilat and I + H significantly attenuated hypertension [male control, 198.3 +/- 6.9 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 149.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg (F = 8.63 P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 145.6 +/- 5.1 mmHg (F = 7.38 P < 0.0001); female control, 170.3 +/-8.3 mmHg versus omapatrilat, 120.0 +/- 4.6 mmHg (F = 8.36, P < 0.0001), versus I + H, 112.2 +/- 2.9 mmHg (F = 9.08, P < 0.0001)] and left ventricular hypertrophy [male + female controls, 3.02 +/- 0.38 mg/g versus omapatrilat, 2.47 +/- 0.26 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.27, 0.83), versus I + H, 2.49 +/- 0.21 mg/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.25, 0.83)]. Both treatments also significantly increased male carotid artery basal NO bioavailability relative to control [control, 0.62 +/- 0.17 g/g versus omapatrilat, 1.95 +/- 0.17 g/g (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, -1.83, -0.36), versus I + H, 1.57 +/- 0.21 g/g (P < 0.026; 95% confidence interval, -1.31, -0.12)]. However, stimulated NO (EC50) was only improved in omapatrilat-treated males [controls, 0.19 +/- 0.06 micromol/l versus omapatrilat, 0.05 +/- 0.01 micromol/l (P = 0.05; 95% confidence interval, -1.16, -0.03)]. CONCLUSIONS:Omapatrilat treatment significantly reduced left ventricular hypertrophy and improved endothelial function in carotid arteries from male SHRSP by NO-dependent mechanisms. Despite equivalent antihypertensive and antihypertrophic actions, a similar improvement in endothelial function, specifically stimulated NO release, was not observed after treatment with I + H.
Authors: Cristina Menni; Delyth Graham; Gabi Kastenmüller; Nora H J Alharbi; Safaa Md Alsanosi; Martin McBride; Massimo Mangino; Philip Titcombe; So-Youn Shin; Maria Psatha; Thomas Geisendorfer; Anja Huber; Annette Peters; Rui Wang-Sattler; Tao Xu; Mary Julia Brosnan; Jeff Trimmer; Christian Reichel; Robert P Mohney; Nicole Soranzo; Mark H Edwards; Cyrus Cooper; Alistair C Church; Karsten Suhre; Christian Gieger; Anna F Dominiczak; Tim D Spector; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Ana M Valdes Journal: Hypertension Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Martina Johannesson; Regina Lopez-Aumatell; Pernilla Stridh; Margarita Diez; Jonatan Tuncel; Gloria Blázquez; Esther Martinez-Membrives; Toni Cañete; Elia Vicens-Costa; Delyth Graham; Richard R Copley; Polinka Hernandez-Pliego; Amennai D Beyeen; Johan Ockinger; Cristina Fernández-Santamaría; Percio S Gulko; Max Brenner; Adolf Tobeña; Marc Guitart-Masip; Lydia Giménez-Llort; Anna Dominiczak; Rikard Holmdahl; Dominique Gauguier; Tomas Olsson; Richard Mott; William Valdar; Eva E Redei; Alberto Fernández-Teruel; Jonathan Flint Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jennifer McLachlan; Elisabeth Beattie; Michael P Murphy; Caline H H Koh-Tan; Erin Olson; Wendy Beattie; Anna F Dominiczak; Stuart A Nicklin; Delyth Graham Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.844