Literature DB >> 15075997

A prospective randomized trial of Tannenbaum-type Teflon-coated stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Anne-Marie van Berkel1, Inge L Huibregtse, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Erik A J Rauws, Marco J Bruno, Kees Huibregtse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stent clogging is a major limitation in the palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Preliminary studies suggested improved duration of patency of a Tannenbaum design stent with a stainless steel mesh and an inner Teflon coating (TTC). We compared the patency of a TTC stent with a conventional polyethylene (PE) stent in a prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: Between February 1998 and September 1998 we included 60 patients with distal malignant bile duct obstruction. Diagnosis included carcinoma of the pancreas (n = 57) and ampullary cancer (n = 3). There were 29 men and 31 women with a median age of 77 years. Stent diameter (10 Fr) and length (11 cm) were similar but both stent design and material were different: a Tannenbaum design stent with a stainless steel mesh and an inner Teflon coating, and an Amsterdam-type PE stent.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were evaluated; 30 in the TTC group and 30 in the PE group. Early complications occurred in two patients in each group. Stent dysfunction occurred in 18 of TTC stents and 12 of PE stents. Median stent patency was 102 days for TTC and 142 days for PE stents (P = 0.41). Median survival did not differ significantly for both treatment groups (TTC, 121 days; PE, 105 days). Stent migration, in all cases proximal into the common bile duct, occurred in four patients in the TTC group versus zero in the PE group (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: This study did not confirm improved patency of Tannenbaum-type Teflon-coated stents. Proximal migration prompts for additional design modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15075997     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200402000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antireflux biliary stents: are they the solution to stent occlusions?

Authors:  D Nageshwar Reddy; Rupa Banerjee; Ong Wai Choung
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-04

2.  A comparative evaluation of early stent occlusion among biliary conventional versus wing stents.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Susan Hutfless; Katherine Kim; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia I Canto; Sanjay B Jagannath; Patrick I Okolo; Eun Ji Shin; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer with obstructive jaundice who are to undergo gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Takasawa; Naotaka Fujita; Go Kobayashi; Yutaka Noda; Kei Ito; Jun Horaguchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A C Moss; E Morris; P Mac Mathuna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

5.  Stenting and interventional radiology for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas.

Authors:  Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Tadahiro Takada; Masaru Miyazaki; Shuichi Miyakawa; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Masato Nagino; Satoshi Kondo; Junji Furuse; Hiroya Saito; Masafumi Suyama; Fumio Kimura; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Satoshi Nozawa; Masahiro Yoshida; Keita Wada; Hodaka Amano; Fumihiko Miura
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-02-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.