Paul A Meyers1. 1. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA. meyersp@mskcc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The principal pediatric sarcomas are Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. While the prognosis for these diseases is generally favorable, it is possible to identify groups of patients with each diagnosis whose prognosis remains unacceptably poor. Based on the chemotherapy sensitivity of these tumors, many investigators have suggested that consolidation with high dose chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy followed by stem cell rescue could improve the prognosis for these high risk patients. This review evaluates the results of high dose therapy with stem cell reconstitution used to consolidate treatment of high risk patients with sarcomas. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of the trials which have been conducted to assess this hypothesis have treated relatively small numbers of patients. They do not use consistent definitions of high risk. They have used different regimens for cytoreduction. They have used a variety of sources for stem cells. In many series, the consolidation therapy is applied only to patients who have achieved a significant response to prior therapy and the results have then been compared to a cohort of patients with similar presenting features, not all of whom responded to initial therapy. SUMMARY: The published results do not demonstrate an unequivocal benefit for consolidation with high-dose therapy. Future trials of high-dose therapy must define rigorous eligibility criteria, must have an appropriate, preferably randomized, control group, and must be designed with sufficient power to evaluate the hypothesis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The principal pediatric sarcomas are Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. While the prognosis for these diseases is generally favorable, it is possible to identify groups of patients with each diagnosis whose prognosis remains unacceptably poor. Based on the chemotherapy sensitivity of these tumors, many investigators have suggested that consolidation with high dose chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy followed by stem cell rescue could improve the prognosis for these high risk patients. This review evaluates the results of high dose therapy with stem cell reconstitution used to consolidate treatment of high risk patients with sarcomas. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of the trials which have been conducted to assess this hypothesis have treated relatively small numbers of patients. They do not use consistent definitions of high risk. They have used different regimens for cytoreduction. They have used a variety of sources for stem cells. In many series, the consolidation therapy is applied only to patients who have achieved a significant response to prior therapy and the results have then been compared to a cohort of patients with similar presenting features, not all of whom responded to initial therapy. SUMMARY: The published results do not demonstrate an unequivocal benefit for consolidation with high-dose therapy. Future trials of high-dose therapy must define rigorous eligibility criteria, must have an appropriate, preferably randomized, control group, and must be designed with sufficient power to evaluate the hypothesis.
Authors: Crystal L Mackall; Eunice H Rhee; Elizabeth J Read; Hanh M Khuu; Susan F Leitman; Donna Bernstein; Merertu Tesso; Lauren M Long; David Grindler; Margret Merino; William Kopp; Maria Tsokos; Jay A Berzofsky; Lee J Helman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nabil Ahmed; Vita S Brawley; Meenakshi Hegde; Catherine Robertson; Alexia Ghazi; Claudia Gerken; Enli Liu; Olga Dakhova; Aidin Ashoori; Amanda Corder; Tara Gray; Meng-Fen Wu; Hao Liu; John Hicks; Nino Rainusso; Gianpietro Dotti; Zhuyong Mei; Bambi Grilley; Adrian Gee; Cliona M Rooney; Malcolm K Brenner; Helen E Heslop; Winfried S Wels; Lisa L Wang; Peter Anderson; Stephen Gottschalk Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Patrick J Stiff; Manza-A Agovi; Karen H Antman; Didier Blaise; Bruce M Camitta; Mitchell S Cairo; Richard W Childs; John R Edwards; Robert Peter Gale; Gregory A Hale; Hillard M Lazarus; Mukta Arora Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Brent S Sorenson; Kaysie L Banton; Natalie L Frykman; Arnold S Leonard; Daniel A Saltzman Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jose Luis Lopez; Concepcion Pérez; Catalina Marquez; Patricia Cabrera; Jose Maria Perez; Gema Lucia Ramirez; Rafael Ordoñez; Juan Manuel Praena-Fernandez; Maria Jose Ortiz Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2011-05-20