Literature DB >> 15075838

An update on ureteroscopic instrumentation for the treatment of urolithiasis.

Demetrius H Bagley1, Ramsay L Kuo, Ilia S Zeltser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ureteroscopic instruments, both endoscopic and working devices, continue to evolve. Changes in instrumentation have necessitated concurrent modifications in ureteroscopic techniques over the years. The safety and efficacy of the ureteroscopic approach for the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi, however, have continued to improve. RECENT
FINDINGS: This review emphasizes the recent advances in the major groups of instruments employed for ureteroscopy. Among the endoscopic instruments, the flexible ureteroscopes have undergone the most notable advances, benefiting from greatly improved deflection and durability. Progress has been made in adjunctive instruments as well. Current stone retrieval devices composed of nitinol-based wire technology are able to easily secure fragments from the most peripheral calices. The holmium laser is a versatile device with proven safety and effectiveness as an endoscopic lithotrite.
SUMMARY: The availability and coordinated use of the latest ureteroscopic instruments have resulted in better treatment outcomes, thus expanding the use of ureteroscopy as a first-line option for the treatment of calculi in appropriate cases. Urologists should be familiar with currently available instrumentation in order to optimize their equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15075838     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  7 in total

1.  [Ureterorenoscopy: yesterday, today, tomorrow].

Authors:  T Knoll; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteric calculi].

Authors:  R Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

4.  Management of lower ureteric stones: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mohamed Etafy; Gamal A M Morsi; Mansour S M Beshir; Sheri S Soliman; Hussein A Galal; Cervando Ortiz-Vanderdys
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-01-27

Review 5.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Noor Buchholz; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-24

6.  Clinical factors associated with postoperative hydronephrosis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Sun Woo Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Sang Un Yim; Yang Hyun Cho; Bo Sung Shin; Ho Seok Chung; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Kyung Jin Oh; Sun-Ouck Kim; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-08-09

7.  Risk factors for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case-control study and analysis of 385 cases of holmium laser ureterolithotripsy.

Authors:  Jiaxin Zheng; Yongfeng Wang; Bin Chen; Huiqiang Wang; Rongfu Liu; Bo Duan; Jinchun Xing
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.195

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.