Literature DB >> 15075831

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?

Beng Jit Tan1, Arthur D Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review factors that affect the success of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair and recent developments in minimally invasive procedures for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent reports and studies further confirm earlier findings that the success rate of endopyelotomy is decreased when a crossing vessel is the primary cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, poor renal function and significant hydronephrosis. Various minimally invasive procedures have emerged recently for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. These include laparoscopic pyeloplasty, robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures, and percutaneous endopyeloplasty. These procedures offer potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy, including better success rates in the presence of crossing vessels, wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, and full-thickness healing with primary intent.
SUMMARY: With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction available, the treatment choice for ureteropelvic junction obstruction must be based on several factors, including the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, the cost of the procedure, and the patient's choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15075831     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.

Authors:  R C Calvert; M M Morsy; B Zelhof; M Rhodes; N A Burgess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter.

Authors:  Ahmed R el-Nahas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  The use of the Acucise technique for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a trade-off between efficacy and invasiveness?

Authors:  Joyce Baard; Theodorus M de Reijke; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: can magnetic resonance urography identify crossing vessels?

Authors:  Kushal R Parikh; Matthew R Hammer; Kate H Kraft; Vesna Ivančić; Ethan A Smith; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-28

5. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Laparoscopic reconstructive urology.

Authors:  Declan Murphy; Ben Challacombe; Abhay Rane
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 7.  Lasers in clinical urology: state of the art and new horizons.

Authors:  Andrew J Marks; Joel M H Teichman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 8.  Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Mikolaj Mendrek; Thomas Alexander Vögeli; Christian Bach
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-15

9.  Retrograde Endopyelotomy with Cutting Balloon™ for Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants.

Authors:  Alberto Parente; Laura Perez-Egido; Rosa Maria Romero; Ruben Ortiz; Laura Burgos; Jose Maria Angulo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Learning curve or experience-related outcome: what really matters in paediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Wojciech Panek; Jakub Szmer; Caroline F Kuijper; Rafal Chrzan
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.