OBJECTIVES: To describe recruitment, screening and baseline characteristics of injection drug users (IDU) participating in a phase III HIV vaccine (AIDSVAX B/E; VaxGen, USA) trial and to compare enrollment characteristics between trial participants and 1209 IDU from a 1995-1998 vaccine trial preparatory cohort for changes that might impact trial design assumptions. METHODS: Enrollment for both studies was conducted at Bangkok narcotic treatment clinics, where a standardized questionnaire was administered on demographics, risk behavior and incarceration history over the previous 6 months. RESULTS:During 1999-2000, 4943 IDU were screened for enrollment; successful sources of recruitment included clinic attendees (43.4%), an IDU referral program (20.4%) and preparatory cohort participants (14.7%). Of those screened, 1689 (34%) were HIV seropositive (HIV subtype B 23.6%; subtype E 76.4%). Of the 2545 enrolled, 93.4% were male. Compared with cohort IDU, trial IDU were younger (mean age: 28.8 versus 31.3 years), better educated (secondary level or higher: 67.2% versus 58.7%), and less likely to inject drugs daily (39.4% versus 90.4%); they were more likely to have been incarcerated (78.4% versus 65.7%), have recently injected stimulants (14.8% versus 5.8%) and tranquilizers (11.5% versus 2.3%), and obtained needles/syringes from a source other than a pharmacist (7.2% versus 3.9%) (all P < or = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: IDU at high risk for HIV have been successfully enrolled in the AIDSVAX B/E efficacy trial. Only minor epidemiologic differences were found at enrollment between trial and preparatory cohort IDU. The latter has proven critical in guiding trial design; results are expected in late 2003.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To describe recruitment, screening and baseline characteristics of injection drug users (IDU) participating in a phase III HIV vaccine (AIDSVAX B/E; VaxGen, USA) trial and to compare enrollment characteristics between trial participants and 1209 IDU from a 1995-1998 vaccine trial preparatory cohort for changes that might impact trial design assumptions. METHODS: Enrollment for both studies was conducted at Bangkok narcotic treatment clinics, where a standardized questionnaire was administered on demographics, risk behavior and incarceration history over the previous 6 months. RESULTS: During 1999-2000, 4943 IDU were screened for enrollment; successful sources of recruitment included clinic attendees (43.4%), an IDU referral program (20.4%) and preparatory cohort participants (14.7%). Of those screened, 1689 (34%) were HIV seropositive (HIV subtype B 23.6%; subtype E 76.4%). Of the 2545 enrolled, 93.4% were male. Compared with cohort IDU, trial IDU were younger (mean age: 28.8 versus 31.3 years), better educated (secondary level or higher: 67.2% versus 58.7%), and less likely to inject drugs daily (39.4% versus 90.4%); they were more likely to have been incarcerated (78.4% versus 65.7%), have recently injected stimulants (14.8% versus 5.8%) and tranquilizers (11.5% versus 2.3%), and obtained needles/syringes from a source other than a pharmacist (7.2% versus 3.9%) (all P < or = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: IDU at high risk for HIV have been successfully enrolled in the AIDSVAX B/E efficacy trial. Only minor epidemiologic differences were found at enrollment between trial and preparatory cohort IDU. The latter has proven critical in guiding trial design; results are expected in late 2003.
Authors: Alan E Greenberg; Jordan Tappero; Kachit Choopanya; Frits van Griensven; Mike Martin; Suphak Vanichseni; Scott Santibanez; Valerie Molotilov; Shannon Hader; Laura N Broyles Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Barbara S Mensch; Barbara A Friedland; Sharon A Abbott; Lauren L Katzen; Waimar Tun; Christine A Kelly; Avina Sarna; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Suniti Solomon Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2013-02
Authors: Andrew Vallely; Ian R Hambleton; Stella Kasindi; Louise Knight; Suzanna C Francis; Tobias Chirwa; Dean Everett; Charles Shagi; Claire Cook; Celia Barberousse; Deborah Watson-Jones; John Changalucha; David Ross; Richard J Hayes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcos Pérez-Losada; David V Jobes; Faruk Sinangil; Keith A Crandall; Miguel Arenas; David Posada; Phillip W Berman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240