Literature DB >> 15074656

Interactive effects of genotype, environment, and ontogeny on resistance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) to the generalist herbivore, Spodoptera exigua.

Rowan D H Barrett1, Anurag A Agrawal.   

Abstract

Host-plant genotype, environment, and ontogeny all play a role in determining plant resistance to herbivory, yet little is known about the nature of the interactions among these factors. We investigated resistance of cucumber plants Cucumis sativus to the generalist herbivore Spodoptera exigua in a manipulative experiment involving three factors. In particular, we tested the effects of bitter (cucurbitacins present) vs. sweet (cucurbitacins absent) plants (genotype), with or without previous herbivory (environment), and cotyledons vs. true leaves (ontogeny). Contrary to our expectations, S. exigua growth was 54% higher on bitter plants than on sweet plants; growth was 63% higher, however, on undamaged plants compared to damaged plants, and 59% higher on true leaves compared to cotyledons. Moreover, all two-way interaction terms between genotype, environment, and ontogeny were significant. For example, S. exigua performance was higher on bitter than on sweet plants; however, this effect was strongly influenced by whether the tissue consumed was a cotyledon or true leaf and also whether it had been previously damaged. An examination of leaf nutritional chemistry revealed that some of our results could be explained by genotypic, environmental, and ontogenic differences in foliar nitrogen content. In contrast, the cucurbitacin content of plants did not appear to affect caterpillar growth. Our results provide evidence for the importance of interactions between genotype, environment, and ontogeny in determining herbivory and illustrate the value of manipulative experiments in revealing the complexities of these interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15074656     DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000013181.50319.9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and behavior of first instar larval Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Myron P Zalucki; Anthony R Clarke; Stephen B Malcolm
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Koricheva; S Larsson; E Haukioja
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Vascular architecture and patchy nutrient availability generate within-plant heterogeneity in plant traits important to herbivores.

Authors:  Colin M Orians; Marcelo Ardón; Basma A Mohammad
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Cucurbitacins as kairomones for diabroticite beetles.

Authors:  R L Metcalf; R A Metcalf; A M Rhodes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Compensation for herbivory by Cucumis sativus through increased photosynthetic capacity and efficiency.

Authors:  Vivien P Thomson; Saul A Cunningham; Marilyn C Ball; Adrienne B Nicotra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-11-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Role of cucurbitacin C in resistance to spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

Authors:  A G Balkema-Boomstra; S Zijlstra; F W A Verstappen; H Inggamer; P E Mercke; M A Jongsma; H J Bouwmeester
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Cucumber Beetle Resistance and Mite Susceptibility Controlled by the Bitter Gene in Cucumis sativus L.

Authors:  C P Da Costa; C M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cucurbitacins: specific insect attractants in Cucurbitaceae.

Authors:  O L Chambliss; C M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Plant age, communication, and resistance to herbivores: young sagebrush plants are better emitters and receivers.

Authors:  Kaori Shiojiri; Richard Karban
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Developmental trajectories in cottonwood phytochemistry.

Authors:  Brian J Rehill; Thomas G Whitham; Gregory D Martinsen; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Joseph K Bailey; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Changes in plant chemical defenses and nutritional quality as a function of ontogeny in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae).

Authors:  Carolina Quintero; M Deane Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Does Plant Cultivar Difference Modify the Bottom-Up Effects of Resource Limitation on Plant-Insect Herbivore Interactions?

Authors:  Peng Han; Nicolas Desneux; Thomas Michel; Jacques Le Bot; Aurelie Seassau; Eric Wajnberg; Edwige Amiens-Desneux; Anne-Violette Lavoir
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Manipulating feeding stimulation to protect crops against insect pests?

Authors:  Maxime R Hervé; Régine Delourme; Antoine Gravot; Nathalie Marnet; Solenne Berardocco; Anne Marie Cortesero
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Understanding ontogenetic trajectories of indirect defence: ecological and anatomical constraints in the production of extrafloral nectaries.

Authors:  Nora Villamil; Judith Márquez-Guzmán; Karina Boege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Microbiomes, plausible players or not in alteration of host behavior.

Authors:  David G Biron; Ludovic Bonhomme; Marianne Coulon; Øyvind Øverli
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Unraveling the roles of genotype and environment in the expression of plant defense phenotypes.

Authors:  Abigail S Potts; Mark D Hunter
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.