| Literature DB >> 15074625 |
A Albihn1, V Båverud, U Magnusson.
Abstract
Uterine microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility was investigated in 239 mares with fertility problems in a prospective study in Sweden. Uterine swab samples were collected with double guarded swabs and transported overnight before being cultured. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) was determined for a panel of antimicrobials. From 152 of the 239 mares at least one bacterial species was isolated, most frequently E. coli (104 isolates), beta-haemolytic streptococci (31) and fungi (16). beta-haemolytic streptococci were more frequently (p < 0.01) associated with clinical endometritis than with repeat breeding. The opposite was true for E. coli (p < 0.01). Among beta-haemolytic streptococcal isolates some resistance was noted for 4 of 11 tested antibiotics, however, all isolates were susceptible to the widely used penicillin G. Among E. coli isolates enrofloxacin was the only of the 10 tested antibiotics for which no resistance was noted. Resistance was most commonly noted to cephalothin (39% of the isolates), streptomycin (22%), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (15%) and ampicillin (11%). In conclusion, we show that both E.coli and beta-haemolytic streptococci are frequently associated with fertility problems in mares and that antimicrobial resistance is a common feature of E. coli but also recognised for beta-haemolytic streptococcal uterine isolates.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 15074625 PMCID: PMC1831563 DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-44-121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Species isolated in microbiological cultivation from uterine swabs from 152 mares. Two bacterial species might be isolated and typed from the same mare.
| Microorganisms | Number | % |
| 1 | <1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 1 | <1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 99 | 64 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 1 | <1 | |
| Gramnegative coccus | 12 | 8 |
| Gramnegative rods, inactive | 11 | 7 |
| 1 | <1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 1 | <1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 1 | <1 | |
| 31 | 20 | |
| 1 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 5 | ||
| Fungi2 | 16 | |
| Yeast, not | 13 | |
| Yeast3 | 2 | |
| Mould | 1 |
1previous name Pseudomonas paucimobilis
2233 out of 239 mares were cultured for fungi
3not further typed
Distribution (no. of isolates) of MIC values for 104 Escherichia coli isolates of the 10 antibiotics tested. Vertical lines show the break points between sensitive (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R). The S-isolates are to the left and the R-isolates to the right of the lines.
| Antimicrobial tested | MIC (mg/L) | Range tested1 | S-I-R % isolates | |||||||||
| ≤ 0,12 | 0,25 | 0,5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | >32 | |||
| Ampicillin2 | 20H1 | 50H2 | 19 | 3 | 11H2 | 2–16 | 86 3 11 | |||||
| Cephalothin | 5 | 14 | 44H1 | 31H4 | 10 | 4–32 | 18 43 39 | |||||
| Chloramphenicol | 4 | 22 | 71H5 | 6 | 1 | 2–16 | 94 6 1 | |||||
| Enrofloxacin | 101H5 | 1 | 2 | 0,25-2 | 97 3 0 | |||||||
| Gentamicin | 48H2 | NT | 52H3 | 3 | 1 | 1–16 | 96 0 4 | |||||
| Neomycin2 | 58H2 | NT | 38H3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2–32 | 93 3 4 | ||||
| Nitrofurantoin3 | 3 | 17 | 76H5 | 7 | 1 | 4–32 | 99 - 1 | |||||
| Oxytetracycline | 6 | NT | 79H4 | 12H1 | 2 | 5 | 1–16 | 81 12 7 | ||||
| Streptomycin | 1 | NT | 51H1 | 23H3 | 6 | 23H1 | 2–32 | 51 27 22 | ||||
| Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole3,4 | 79 | NT | 6H5 | 3 | NT | NT | 1 | 15 | 0,12-8 | 85 - 15 | ||
1 When the MIC value was above the range tested, the value for the next titration step (the value just above the range) was used.
2 One strain not tested.
3 The vertical line shows the break point between S and R, no I sensitivity is given.
4 The MIC value for trimethoprim tested in combination with sulfamethoxazol (1:20) is given. H1-5 The number of haemolytic E. coli isolates.
NT = not tested, the titration step is not included in the VetMIC™ system.
Distribution (no. of isolates) of MIC values for 31 β-haemolytic streptococcal isolates of the 11 antibiotics tested. Vertical lines show the break points between sensitive (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R) isolates. The S are to the left and the R to the right of the lines.
| Antimicrobial tested | MIC (mg/L) | Range tested1 | S-I-R % isolates | ||||||||||
| ≤ 0,06 | 0,12 | 0,25 | 0,5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | >32 | |||
| Ampicillin | 30 | 1 | NT | NT | 0,12–16 | 100 0 0 | |||||||
| Cephalothin | 31 | 4–16 | 100 0 0 | ||||||||||
| Chloramphenicol | 15 | 15 | 1 | 2–16 | 100 - 0 | ||||||||
| Clindamycin2 | 28 | NT | 3 | 1–4 | 90 0 10 | ||||||||
| Erythromycin3 | 31 | 0,5-4 | 100 0 0 | ||||||||||
| Gentamicin | NT | 6 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 1–16 | 19 29 52 | ||||||
| Neomycin | 1 | NT | 3 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 2–32 | 13 48 39 | |||||
| Oxytetracycline | 9 | NT | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1–16 | 29 48 23 | ||||||
| Penicillin G | 31 | NT | NT | NT | NT | 0,06-8 | 100 0 0 | ||||||
| Spiramycin4 | 31 | 4–32 | 100 - 0 | ||||||||||
| Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole4,5 | 17 | 5 | 6 | NT | NT | 1 | 2 | 0.12-8 | 90 3 7 | ||||
1 When the MIC value was above the range tested, the value for the next titration step (the value just above the range) was used.
2 All isolates equal to or less than 1 were regarded as S since this was the lowest concentration tested.
3 All isolates equal to or less than 0.5 were regarded as S since this was the lowest concentration tested.
4The vertical line shows the break point between S and Rt, no I-sensitivity is given.
5The MIC value for trimethoprim tested in combination with sulfamethoxazol (1:20) is given.
NT = not tested, the titration step is not included in the VetMIC™ system.