Literature DB >> 15073941

Potential utility of electronic drug compliance monitoring in measures of adverse outcomes associated with immunosuppressive agents.

H I Feldman1, M Hackett, W Bilker, B L Strom.   

Abstract

Poor compliance with prescribed medications limits the effectiveness of many pharmacologic therapies and enhances their potential toxicities. Traditional methods of measuring drug-taking behavior, including direct observation, patient self-report, pill counts, and therapeutic drug level monitoring, all have well-described limitations in validity and interpretability. Electronic medication event monitoring has been used to assess compliance with therapies for hypertension, glaucoma, anemia, and epilepsy, overcoming many problems of traditional approaches. However, no published reports describe the use of electronic monitoring with immunosuppressive agents, despite their increasing use for non-life-threatening conditions and their many dose-dependent toxicities. Transplant recipients are thought to be at particular risk from noncompliance. Therefore, we undertook this study to assess the feasibility of electronically monitoring compliance with immunosuppressive drugs among renal allograft recipients. Twenty-five kidney transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive medications from a single pharmacy were enrolled. Each subject received electronic monitors with their immunosuppressive serum drug refills for cyclosporine and azathioprine. Each subject returned their monitors after the first month of this 2-month study for downloading data. The frequency distribution of interdose intervals were described. Two measures of average non-compliance were calculated for both drugs: the proportion of monitored days that had missed doses, and the proportion of missed doses. Once daily and twice daily regimens of cyclosporine were compared. Concordance in drug compliance between the two drugs was calculated for each subject and averaged over the study population. Twenty-two of 25 subjects missed one or more doses of cyclosporine or azathioprine. Seventeen (68%) subjects never missed four or more consecutive doses. Subjects were non-compliant with cyclosporine on 8.7% of monitored days, and non-compliance with azathioprine on 9.8% of monitored days. Subjects were non-compliant with 6.8% of their cyclosporine doses and 9.8% of their azathioprine doses. Patients were compliant with both drugs on 86.6% of days and were non-compliant with both drugs on 5.1% of days. Subjects were non-compliant with cyclosporine during 5% and 13.2% of monitored days for once and twice daily dosing regimens, respectively. Concordance analysis demonstrated that for 91.7% of days of monitoring, compliance information was identical for both drugs. This study demonstrated the feasibility of electronic medication event monitoring among kidney transplant patients. This methodology represents an important tool for monitoring compliance of immunosuppressive agents essential to their safe and effective use, and should be considered for use in future studies of these drugs and others with substantial dose-dependent toxicity. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15073941     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199901/02)8:1<1::AID-PDS382>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  8 in total

1.  Electronically measured adherence to immunosuppressive medications and kidney function after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ajay K Israni; Francis L Weng; Ye-Ying Cen; Marshall Joffe; Malek Kamoun; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Pharmacokinetically based estimation of patient compliance with oral anticancer chemotherapies: in silico evaluation.

Authors:  Emilie Hénin; Michel Tod; Véronique Trillet-Lenoir; Catherine Rioufol; Brigitte Tranchand; Pascal Girard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Time-in-a-bottle (TIAB): a longitudinal, correlational study of patterns, potential predictors, and outcomes of immunosuppressive medication adherence in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Cynthia L Russell; Catherine Ashbaugh; Leanne Peace; Muammer Cetingok; Karen Q Hamburger; Sarah Owens; Deanna Coffey; Andrew W Webb; Donna Hathaway; Rebecca P Winsett; Richard Madsen; Mark R Wakefield
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 4.  Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Paul E Morrissey; Michelle L Flynn; Sonia Lin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial.

Authors:  S Bunnapradist; K Ciechanowski; P West-Thielke; S Mulgaonkar; L Rostaing; B Vasudev; K Budde
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Efficacy of interventions for adherence to the immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yichen Zhu; Yifan Zhou; Lei Zhang; Jian Zhang; Jun Lin
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus capsules to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Osama Gaber; Rita R Alloway; Kenneth Bodziak; Bruce Kaplan; Suphamai Bunnapradist
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus Tablets Versus Twice-Daily Capsules in De Novo Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Derek A DuBay; Lewis Teperman; Kimi Ueda; Andrew Silverman; William Chapman; Angel E Alsina; Carmelina Tyler; Daniel R Stevens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2019-01-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.