Literature DB >> 15073857

Sentinel lymph nodes in malignant melanoma: extended histopathologic evaluation improves diagnostic precision.

Helene Nortvig Abrahamsen1, Stephen J Hamilton-Dutoit, Jørn Larsen, Torben Steiniche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) assessment in patients with melanoma is controversial. Molecular analysis (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) detects significantly greater numbers of SNs with suspected micrometastases (up to 71%) than does routine histopathology (approximately 20%). The authors sought to identify possible reasons for this discrepancy and to determine whether using an extended histopathologic protocol could improve diagnostic precision.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one SNs from 100 consecutive patients with cutaneous melanomas that measured 1-4 mm in thickness were bisected, and half of the lymph node was examined according to an extensive histopathologic protocol involving serial sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of 3 melanocyte-associated markers (S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A).
RESULTS: Lymph node melanocytic lesions were frequent, with micrometastases and benign nevus inclusions (BNI) found in SNs in 28% and 28% of patients, respectively (4 SNs contained both). Melan-A was the most sensitive immunohistochemical marker and was positive in all BNI-positive SNs and 97% of micrometastasis-positive SNs. Although HMB-45 showed differential labeling in micrometastases compared with BNI (82% vs. 16%), immunohistochemistry could not distinguish between those lesions. Micrometastases were already identified on the first central level in 49% of positive SNs, whereas only 23% of SNs with BNI were diagnosed on the first level.
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive serial sectioning with immunohistochemical analysis substantially increased the histopathologic detection of micrometastases and BNI in melanoma SNs to a level approaching the level reported for molecular techniques. The large number of BNIs represents an important potential source of imprecision (false positivity) in SN assays based on nonmorphologic methods. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15073857     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Quantification of melanoma mRNA markers in sentinel nodes: pre-clinical evaluation of a single-step real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  Helene N Abrahamsen; Ebba Nexo; Torben Steiniche; Stephen J Hamilton-Dutoit; Boe S Sorensen
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  [Diagnostics of malignant melanoma of the skin : Recommendations of the current S3 guidelines on histology and molecular pathology].

Authors:  C Rose
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.

Authors:  Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  [Diagnostics of malignant melanoma of the skin : Recommendations of the current S3 guidelines on histology and molecular pathology].

Authors:  C Rose
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 5.  Importance of tumor load in the sentinel node in melanoma: clinical dilemmas.

Authors:  Alexander C J van Akkooi; Cornelis Verhoef; Alexander M M Eggermont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  [Recommendations for the handling and oncologic pathology report of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease in gynecologic malignancies].

Authors:  L-C Horn; J Einenkel; M Höckel; H Kölbl; F Kommoss; S F Lax; L Riethdorf; H-G Schnürch; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to distinguish intranodal nevus from metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Scott R Dalton; Pedram Gerami; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Susan Charzan; Rob Werling; Philip E LeBoit; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  One-day or two-day procedure for sentinel node biopsy in melanoma?

Authors:  A H Chakera; J Lock-Andersen; U Hesse; B M Nürnberg; B R Juhl; K H Stokholm; K T Drzewiecki; B Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  The Role and Necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Melanoma.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Nakamura
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-22

10.  Quantitative measurement of melanoma spread in sentinel lymph nodes and survival.

Authors:  Anja Ulmer; Klaus Dietz; Isabelle Hodak; Bernhard Polzer; Sebastian Scheitler; Murat Yildiz; Zbigniew Czyz; Petra Lehnert; Tanja Fehm; Christian Hafner; Stefan Schanz; Martin Röcken; Claus Garbe; Helmut Breuninger; Gerhard Fierlbeck; Christoph A Klein
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.