Literature DB >> 15073850

Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Stephen J Freedland1, William J Aronson, Joseph C Presti, Christopher L Amling, Martha K Terris, Bruce Trock, Christopher J Kane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seminal vesicle (SV) invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) generally is considered to be indicative of poor outcome. The authors examined whether there was a subset of men with SV invasion who had long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival.
METHODS: Data were examined from 1687 men who underwent RP between 1988 and 2002 at 5 equal-access medical centers. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of SV invasion at the time of RP. Clinical and pathologic variables as well as biochemical outcome data were compared across the groups using rank-sum, chi-square, and log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the significant predictors of time to PSA failure among men with SV invasion.
RESULTS: Men with SV invasion had significantly higher PSA values, higher clinical stage, higher grade tumors, and were more likely to have concomitant extracapsular extension or a positive surgical margin. The 5-year PSA progression-free rates for men who had SV invasion was 36%, compared with 70% among men who had no SV invasion. Among men who had SV invasion, using multivariate analysis, only age (P = 0.023), pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.041), and surgical margin status (P = 0.019) were found to be independent predictors of PSA failure. By combining significant prognostic variables, the authors identified a subset of men with SV invasion, low-grade tumors (Gleason score 2-6), and negative surgical margins who had a 5-year PSA progression-free rate of 69%. Men with SV invasion, Gleason scores 2-6 tumors, negative surgical margins, and age > or = 60 years (n = 11; 8%) had a 5-year PSA progression-free rate of 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of men with SV invasion have high-grade disease and a short time to biochemical failure, the authors identified a subset of men with low-grade disease, negative surgical margins, and older age who, despite SV invasion, had an extremely favorable clinical course. Thus, SV invasion does not uniformly suggest an unfavorable prognosis. prognosis. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15073850     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Hypermethylation of genes for diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donkena Krishna Vanaja; Mathias Ehrich; Dirk Van den Boom; John C Cheville; R Jeffrey Karnes; Donald J Tindall; Charles R Cantor; Charles Y F Young
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  The prognostic impact of seminal vesicle involvement found at prostatectomy and the effects of adjuvant radiation: data from Southwest Oncology Group 8794.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Bryan Goldman; Catherine M Tangen; Joseph Chin; Edward Messing; Edith Canby-Hagino; Jeffrey D Forman; Ian M Thompson; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Buhmeida; S Pyrhönen; M Laato; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Hakan Turk; Orcun Celik; Sitki Un; Mehmet Yoldas; Cemal Selcuk İsoglu; Mustafa Karabicak; Batuhan Ergani; Gokhan Koc; Ferruh Zorlu; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 6.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa; Victor Srougi; Igor Nunes-Silva; Mohammed Baghdadi; Gregory Rembeyo; Sophie S Eiffel; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Bilateral Seminal Vesicle Invasion Is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes in Locally Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.

Authors:  Natalia Vidal Crespo; Laura Enguita Arnal; Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer; Argimiro Collado Serra; Juan Manuel Mascarós; Ana Calatrava Fons; Juan Casanova Ramón-Borja; José Rubio Briones; Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.948

8.  Prognostic value of seminal vesicle invasion on preoperative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in pathological stage T3b prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Gheeyoung Choe; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle involvement (T3b): A multicentric retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Flora Goupy; Stéphane Supiot; David Pasquier; Igor Latorzeff; Ulrike Schick; Erik Monpetit; Geoffrey Martinage; Chloé Hervé; Bernadette Le Proust; Joel Castelli; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.