Literature DB >> 15072978

Effect of 3D nitrogen, dry mass per area and local irradiance on canopy photosynthesis within leaves of contrasted heterogeneous maize crops.

J-L Drouet1, R Bonhomme.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nitrogen partitioning within stands has been described fairly comprehensively, especially for C(3) plants in dense stands where the horizontal heterogeneity of foliage distribution is relatively small. Nitrogen has been shown to be distributed vertically and in parallel to light, maximizing carbon assimilation and stand productivity. Conversely, row crops such as maize (C(4) plants) are characterized by strong horizontal heterogeneity of foliage distribution, and a three-dimensional (3D) approach is required to investigate the combined effect of spatial distribution of nitrogen and light on canopy photosynthesis. MODEL: The 3D geometry of maize canopies was modelled with varying densities and at different developmental stages using plant digitizing under field conditions. For lamina parts, photosynthesis was measured and nitrogen content per unit area (N(a)) was described from analysis of nitrogen content per unit mass (N(m)) and dry mass per unit area (M(a)). Hyperbolic relationships between photosynthesis at irradiance saturation (P(max)) and N(a) were established as well as a linear relationship between dark respiration (R(d)) and N(a), whereas quantum efficiency (alpha) was found to be independent of N(a). KEY RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: N(m), M(a) and N(a) were shown to change over time vertically (i.e. between laminae), which has been largely reported previously, and horizontally (i.e. within laminae), which has scarcely been described previously. Even if M(a) played a major role in N(a), a strong relationship between N(a) and M(a) could not be demonstrated, whereas several previous studies have found that N(a) was essentially related to M(a) rather than N(m). From simulations of radiative exchange using a 3D volume-based approach and lamina photosynthesis using a hyperbola, it was shown that real patterns of N(a) partitioning could increase daily crop photosynthesis by up to 8 % compared with uniform patterns of N(a), especially for the earliest stages of stand development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15072978      PMCID: PMC4242304          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  6 in total

1.  Optimality and nitrogen allocation in a tree canopy.

Authors:  D Y Hollinger
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Effect of Ear Removal on CO(2) Exchange and Activities of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase and Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase of Maize Hybrids and Inbred Lines.

Authors:  S J Crafts-Brandner; C G Poneleit
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants: II. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Gas Exchange Characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.).

Authors:  R F Sage; R W Pearcy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Photosynthetic light acclimation in peach leaves: importance of changes in mass:area ratio, nitrogen concentration, and leaf nitrogen partitioning.

Authors:  X Le Roux; A S Walcroft; H Sinoquet; M M Chaves; A Rodrigues; L Osorio
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.196

5.  Variations in leaf morphometry and nitrogen concentration in Betula pendula Roth., Corylus avellana L. and Lonicera xylosteum L.

Authors:  O Kull; U Niinemets
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Distribution of leaf mass per unit area and leaf nitrogen concentration determine partitioning of leaf nitrogen within tree canopies.

Authors:  A. Rosati; K. R. Day; T. M. DeJong
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.196

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Enhancement of crop photosynthesis by diffuse light: quantifying the contributing factors.

Authors:  T Li; E Heuvelink; T A Dueck; J Janse; G Gort; L F M Marcelis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Dynamics of light and nitrogen distribution during grain filling within wheat canopy.

Authors:  Jessica Bertheloot; Pierre Martre; Bruno Andrieu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The Amount of Nitrogen Used for Photosynthesis Modulates Molecular Evolution in Plants.

Authors:  Steven Kelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.