A Böhle1, P R Bock. 1. HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) with mitomycin C (MMC) on progression of Stage Ta and T1 bladder carcinoma. METHODS: Combined published and unpublished data from comparative studies on BCG versus MMC in superficial bladder carcinoma were analyzed, considering possible confounding factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the primary effect size estimate. Tumor progression was defined as progression to a higher tumor stage or the development of metastatic disease. RESULTS: In nine eligible clinical trials, 1277 patients were treated with BCG and 1133 with MMC. Within the overall median follow-up of 26 months, 7.67% of the patients in the BCG group and 9.44% of the patients in the MMC group developed tumor progression. In all nine individual studies and in the combined results, no statistically significant difference in the ORs for progression between the BCG and MMC-treated groups was found (combined OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03; P = 0.081). In the subgroup with BCG maintenance, the combined result of the five individual studies showed a statistically significant superiority of BCG over MMC (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; P = 0.02). In the four studies without BCG maintenance, the combined result indicated no statistically significant difference between the two treatments (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.07; P = 0.612). Potential confounders, such as tumor risk status, duration of follow-up, BCG strain, BCG and MMC treatment regimen, and year of publication did not significantly influence these results. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority for BCG compared with MMC for the prevention of tumor progression only if BCG maintenance therapy was provided.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) with mitomycin C (MMC) on progression of Stage Ta and T1 bladder carcinoma. METHODS: Combined published and unpublished data from comparative studies on BCG versus MMC in superficial bladder carcinoma were analyzed, considering possible confounding factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the primary effect size estimate. Tumor progression was defined as progression to a higher tumor stage or the development of metastatic disease. RESULTS: In nine eligible clinical trials, 1277 patients were treated with BCG and 1133 with MMC. Within the overall median follow-up of 26 months, 7.67% of the patients in the BCG group and 9.44% of the patients in the MMC group developed tumor progression. In all nine individual studies and in the combined results, no statistically significant difference in the ORs for progression between the BCG and MMC-treated groups was found (combined OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03; P = 0.081). In the subgroup with BCG maintenance, the combined result of the five individual studies showed a statistically significant superiority of BCG over MMC (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; P = 0.02). In the four studies without BCG maintenance, the combined result indicated no statistically significant difference between the two treatments (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.07; P = 0.612). Potential confounders, such as tumor risk status, duration of follow-up, BCG strain, BCG and MMC treatment regimen, and year of publication did not significantly influence these results. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority for BCG compared with MMC for the prevention of tumor progression only if BCG maintenance therapy was provided.
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Ashish M Kamat; Alexander Zlotta; Bernard H Bochner; Ronald Moore; Alan So; Jonathan Izawa; Ricardo A Rendon; Louis Lacombe; Armen G Aprikian Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Rick Bangs; Stephen A Boorjian; Mark K Buyyounouski; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas W Flaig; Terence Friedlander; Richard E Greenberg; Khurshid A Guru; Noah Hahn; Harry W Herr; Christopher Hoimes; Brant A Inman; A Karim Kader; Adam S Kibel; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff Michalski; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lance C Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Daniel Petrylak; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Wade J Sexton; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Guru Sonpavde; Jonathan Tward; Geoffrey Wile; Mary A Dwyer; Courtney Smith Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Khaled Al Othman; Shouki Bazarbashi; Khalid Balaraj; Mohamed Al Otaibi; Baher Kamal; Ibraheem Al Oraifi; Eyad Al Saeed; Khalid Al Gamdi; Ali Jubran; Ahmad Salah; Jalal Al Shareef; Jamal Zekri Journal: Urol Ann Date: 2011-03