BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is an approved medication for the treatment of opioid dependence. Three sublingual formulations have been used at various times during its development-a solution containing alcohol, tablets containing buprenorphine alone, and tablets containing buprenorphine plus naloxone. This study compared the relative buprenorphine bioavailability of these different formulations. METHODS: Outpatient volunteers (N = 10) were maintained for 14 days of daily administration on each formulation; the dose of buprenorphine (8 mg) was constant across formulations. Blood samples were collected and tested for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations after 7 and 14 days maintenance on each formulation. Serial samples were collected before and for 6 h after a daily dose of each formulation. RESULTS: Peak buprenorphine concentrations (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) for the 6h interval (AUC(0-6)) were highest for the solution and lowest for buprenorphine alone tablets; values for combination tablets were more similar to those for solution. Differences between formulations were less pronounced at day 14 than day 7. There was considerable between-subject variability in concentrations produced. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest there may be greater bioavailability of buprenorphine/naloxone versus buprenorphine alone tablets, and that the bioavailability of buprenorphine from the former is very similar to that seen with solution after 2 weeks of stabilization on each formulation.
BACKGROUND:Buprenorphine is an approved medication for the treatment of opioid dependence. Three sublingual formulations have been used at various times during its development-a solution containing alcohol, tablets containing buprenorphine alone, and tablets containing buprenorphine plus naloxone. This study compared the relative buprenorphine bioavailability of these different formulations. METHODS:Outpatient volunteers (N = 10) were maintained for 14 days of daily administration on each formulation; the dose of buprenorphine (8 mg) was constant across formulations. Blood samples were collected and tested for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations after 7 and 14 days maintenance on each formulation. Serial samples were collected before and for 6 h after a daily dose of each formulation. RESULTS: Peak buprenorphine concentrations (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) for the 6h interval (AUC(0-6)) were highest for the solution and lowest for buprenorphine alone tablets; values for combination tablets were more similar to those for solution. Differences between formulations were less pronounced at day 14 than day 7. There was considerable between-subject variability in concentrations produced. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest there may be greater bioavailability of buprenorphine/naloxone versus buprenorphine alone tablets, and that the bioavailability of buprenorphine from the former is very similar to that seen with solution after 2 weeks of stabilization on each formulation.
Authors: Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Sarah E Evans; Melissa Blank; Cynthia Sams; Michael F Weaver; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Chee M Ng; Erin Dombrowsky; Hopi Lin; Michelle E Erlich; David E Moody; Jeffrey S Barrett; Walter K Kraft Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 4.705