Literature DB >> 15072619

Ureteral ultrasonic lithotripsy revisited: a neglected tool?

Uri Gur1, David A Lifshitz, Dov Lask, Pinhas M Livne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ultrasonic lithotripsy was one of the first modalities used for treating renal and ureteral stones. However, in recent years, it has been largely replaced by newer techniques such as laser lithotripsy with rigid as well as flexible ureteroscopes. The aim of this study was to review the results and our current indications for ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy (UUL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and May 2002, 340 ureteroscopies were performed for the treatment of ureteral stones in the Rabin Medical Center. Of this series, 9 patients (2.6%) underwent UUL using a semirigid 8F ureteroscope (Wolf) and an Olympus ultrasonic lithotripter (LUS-1) with a 4.5F hollow probe. Four patients had Steinstrasse following shockwave lithotripsy, four had large (1-2-mm) ureteral stones, and one had an impacted calcified ureteral double-J stent. Stones >5 mm were initially fragmented by the holmium laser (550-microm fiber). A double-J stent was placed in all patients. The mean follow-up time was 20 months.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 84 minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. Eight patients became stone free after the first procedure, and the other underwent secondary ureteroscopy, which rendered him stone free.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom UUL is performed are relatively complex stone patients. The use of ultrasonic lithotripsy following, or in combination with, laser or ballistic devices utilizes the unique properties of UUL, which combines stone fragmentation and efficient removal of small fragments. The technique was particularly useful in patients with Steinstrasse or a large stone burden. Thus, UUL has a limited but significant role in the treatment of ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15072619     DOI: 10.1089/089277904322959752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Wu; Yong-Zhi Wang; Tong-Zu Liu; Xing-Huan Wang; Ci Zhang; Wei-Bing Zhang; Hang Zheng; Yin-Gao Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 2.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ekrem Akdeniz; Lokman İrkılata; Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; Acun Saylık; Mustafa Suat Bolat; Necmettin Şahinkaya; Mehmet Zengin; Mustafa Kemal Atilla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Clinical outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for 2,129 patients with ureteral stones.

Authors:  Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Nobutoshi Oka; Masashi Shinozaki; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.