Mike Ufer1, Elin Kimland, Ulf Bergman. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. mikeufer@gmx.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the extent and characteristics of off-label prescribing for paediatric outpatients among drugs reported to have caused an adverse reaction. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational analysis of spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in Sweden in the year 2000. We included all reports concerning drugs prescribed for outpatients younger than 16 years. Each ADR was classified with respect to its causality, seriousness and type of reaction. Off-label prescribing was evaluated with respect to age, dose, indication, formulation and route and frequency of administration. RESULTS: We identified 112 patient-linked reports corresponding to 158 ADRs of which 31% were serious. Antiasthmatic drugs were most frequently suspected as a cause of almost every third adverse reaction. The average proportion of off-label drug prescribing amounted to 42.4%. It was more frequently associated with serious than non-serious ADRs and mostly due to a non-approved age or dose. The most common clinical manifestations were psychiatric disorders and mucocutaneous inflammatory reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label prescribing for paediatric outpatients is common among drugs reported to have caused an ADR. It is suggested to further identify unlabelled drugs frequently contributing to, in particular serious ADRs in children for a proper benefit-risk assessment of off-label drug use.
PURPOSE: To investigate the extent and characteristics of off-label prescribing for paediatric outpatients among drugs reported to have caused an adverse reaction. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational analysis of spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in Sweden in the year 2000. We included all reports concerning drugs prescribed for outpatients younger than 16 years. Each ADR was classified with respect to its causality, seriousness and type of reaction. Off-label prescribing was evaluated with respect to age, dose, indication, formulation and route and frequency of administration. RESULTS: We identified 112 patient-linked reports corresponding to 158 ADRs of which 31% were serious. Antiasthmatic drugs were most frequently suspected as a cause of almost every third adverse reaction. The average proportion of off-label drug prescribing amounted to 42.4%. It was more frequently associated with serious than non-serious ADRs and mostly due to a non-approved age or dose. The most common clinical manifestations were psychiatric disorders and mucocutaneous inflammatory reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label prescribing for paediatric outpatients is common among drugs reported to have caused an ADR. It is suggested to further identify unlabelled drugs frequently contributing to, in particular serious ADRs in children for a proper benefit-risk assessment of off-label drug use.
Authors: M Bajcetic; M Jelisavcic; J Mitrovic; N Divac; S Simeunovic; R Samardzic; R Gorodischer Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-09-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kazeem A Oshikoya; Gerold T Wharton; Debbie Avant; Sara L Van Driest; Norman E Fenn; Allison Lardieri; Edwin Doe; Beena G Sood; Carol Taketomo; Phuong Lieu; Lilly Yen; Ann W McMahon Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: S B Bavdekar; Pranjali A Sadawarte; Nithya J Gogtay; Surabhi S Jain; Sandhya Jadhav Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.967