Literature DB >> 15071591

Dependence of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude.

Bradford M Clement1.   

Abstract

An important constraint on the processes governing the geodynamo--the flow in the outer core responsible for generating Earth's magnetic field--is the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals; that is, how long it takes for Earth's magnetic field to reverse. It is generally accepted that Earth's magnetic field strength drops to low levels during polarity reversals, and the field direction progresses through a 180 degrees change while the field is weak. The time it takes for this process to happen, however, remains uncertain, with estimates ranging from a few thousand up to 28,000 years. Here I present an analysis of the available sediment records of the four most recent polarity reversals. These records yield an average estimate of about 7,000 years for the time it takes for the directional change to occur. The variation about this mean duration is not random, but instead varies with site latitude, with shorter durations observed at low-latitude sites, and longer durations observed at mid- to high-latitude sites. Such variation of duration with site latitude is predicted by simple geometrical reversal models, in which non-dipole fields are allowed to persist while the axial dipole decays through zero and then builds in the opposite direction, and provides a constraint on numerical dynamo models.

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071591     DOI: 10.1038/nature02459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  6 in total

Review 1.  Changes in earth's dipole.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Hagay Amit
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-17

Review 2.  Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Valet; Alexandre Fournier
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 22.000

3.  Multidecadally resolved polarity oscillations during a geomagnetic excursion.

Authors:  Yu-Min Chou; Xiuyang Jiang; Qingsong Liu; Hsun-Ming Hu; Chung-Che Wu; Jianxing Liu; Zhaoxia Jiang; Teh-Quei Lee; Chun-Chieh Wang; Yen-Fang Song; Cheng-Cheng Chiang; Liangcheng Tan; Mahjoor A Lone; Yongxin Pan; Rixiang Zhu; Yaoqi He; Yu-Chen Chou; An-Hung Tan; Andrew P Roberts; Xiang Zhao; Chuan-Chou Shen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamical similarity of geomagnetic field reversals.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Valet; Alexandre Fournier; Vincent Courtillot; Emilio Herrero-Bervera
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Snowball Earth climate dynamics and Cryogenian geology-geobiology.

Authors:  Paul F Hoffman; Dorian S Abbot; Yosef Ashkenazy; Douglas I Benn; Jochen J Brocks; Phoebe A Cohen; Grant M Cox; Jessica R Creveling; Yannick Donnadieu; Douglas H Erwin; Ian J Fairchild; David Ferreira; Jason C Goodman; Galen P Halverson; Malte F Jansen; Guillaume Le Hir; Gordon D Love; Francis A Macdonald; Adam C Maloof; Camille A Partin; Gilles Ramstein; Brian E J Rose; Catherine V Rose; Peter M Sadler; Eli Tziperman; Aiko Voigt; Stephen G Warren
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  How the Geomagnetic Field Influences Life on Earth - An Integrated Approach to Geomagnetobiology.

Authors:  Weronika Erdmann; Hanna Kmita; Jakub Z Kosicki; Łukasz Kaczmarek
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 1.950

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.