Literature DB >> 15071485

Association of left bundle branch block with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study.

Z B Li1, K Wachtell, P M Okin, E Gerdts, J E Liu, M S Nieminen, S Jern, B Dahlöf, R B Devereux.   

Abstract

Electrocardiographic (ECG) left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but its relation to left ventricular (LV) geometry and function in hypertensive patients with ECG LVH is unknown. Echocardiograms were performed in 933 patients (548 women, mean age 66+/-7 years) with essential hypertension and LVH by baseline ECG in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. LBBB, defined by Minnesota code 7.1, was present in 47 patients and absent in 886 patients. Patients with and without LBBB were similar in age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes, and history of myocardial infarction. Despite similarly elevated mean LV mass (126+/-25 vs 124+/-26 g/m(2)) and relative wall thickness (0.41+/-0.07 vs 0.41+/-0.07, P=NS), patients with LBBB had lower LV fractional shortening (30+/-6 vs 34+/-6%), ejection fraction (56+/-10 vs 61+/-8%), midwall shortening (14+/-2 vs 16+/-2%), stress-corrected midwall shortening (90+/-13 vs 97+/-13%) (all P<0.001), and lower LV stroke index (38+/-7 vs 42+/-9 ml/m(2)) (P<0.05). Patients with LBBB also had reduced LV inferior wall and lower mitral E/A ratio (0.75+/-0.18 vs 0.87+/-0.38) (all P<0.05). The above univariate results were confirmed by multivariate analyses adjusted for gender, age, blood pressures, height, weight, body mass index, heart rate, and LV mass index. Among hypertensive patients at high risk because of ECG LVH, the presence of LBBB identifies individuals with worse global and regional LV systolic function and impaired LV relaxation without more severe LVH by echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071485     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  5 in total

Review 1.  Left bundle branch block: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomic features, electrovectorcardiography, and classification proposal.

Authors:  Andrés R Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Marianne P C de Rezende Barbosa; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz C de Abreu; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Clinical determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration in patients suffered from complete left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashemi Jazi; Peyman Nilforoush; Mojgan Gharipour; Azadeh Batvandi; Robabeh Mohammadi; Roya Najafi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 0.611

3.  Usefulness of ECG criteria to rule out left ventricular hypertrophy in older individuals with true left bundle branch block: an observational study.

Authors:  Caio Assis Moura Tavares; Nelson Samesima; Felippe Lazar Neto; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Lucas C Godoy; Eduardo Messias Hirano Padrão; Mirella Facin; Wilson Jacob Filho; Michael E Farkouh; Carlos Alberto Pastore
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 4.  TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities.

Authors:  Antonio Mangieri; Claudio Montalto; Matteo Pagnesi; Giuseppe Lanzillo; Ozan Demir; Luca Testa; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-03

Review 5.  Missing Link between Molecular Aspects of Ventricular Arrhythmias and QRS Complex Morphology in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Ljuba Bacharova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.