Literature DB >> 1507096

Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.

C B Mandilaris1, C C Beard, J A Clayton.   

Abstract

The electronic pantograph (Pantronic) records mandibular movements and computes the articulator settings. The Pantronic pantograph does not determine the intercondylar distance but approximates it from the interfacial width at the condyles. An average distance of 12.5 mm is subtracted from each side to determine the intercondylar distance. This study recorded 45 patients' articulator intercondylar distances that had been set from a mechanical pantograph and they were compared with the Pantronic's approximation. The difference between the interfacial width and the actual intercondylar distance was 15.1 mm on the right side and 14.9 mm on the left side. A numerical value of 15.0 mm was statistically superior to the Pantronic's 12.5 mm in estimating the average distance between the intercondylar distance and the surface of the skin at the condyle. No statistically significant difference was found between the differences of interfacial width and intercondylar distance values for men and women (p greater than 0.05). The mean intercondylar distance was 56.5 mm on the right side and 56.7 mm on the left side. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean intercondylar distances of men and women (p less than 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1507096     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90241-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  2 in total

1.  Relationship of inter-condylar distance with inter-dental distance of maxillary arch and occlusal vertical dimension: a clinical anthropometric study.

Authors:  Nitai Debnath; Renu Gupta; A Meenakshi; Sandeep Kumar; Sadananda Hota; Pratibha Rawat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

2.  Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Christian Reis Lemes; Carolina Fernandes Tozzi; Saulo Gribel; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Giovana Cherubini Venezian; Caroline do Carmo Menezes; William Custodio
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.