OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an increased capsular width evidenced by ultrasound (US) could be an indirect marker of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion. METHODS: 138 TMJs were evaluated by US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by two blinded calibrated investigators. US measures of capsular width (in mm) and MRI diagnosis of TMJ effusion (presence/absence) were used to perform a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in order to assess the most accurate cut-off value of capsular width that was able to discriminate between joints with and without MRI effusion. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy of US to detect MRI-depicted TMJ effusion was good (area under the ROC curve=0.817). US sensitivity was high for values below the cut-off value of 1.950 mm (true positive rate (TPR)=83.9%; false positive rate (FPR)=26.3%), while specificity was high for values above the cut-off value of 2.150 mm (TPR=71.0%; FPR=11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of ROC curve appears to reveal that the critical area is around the 2 mm value for TMJ capsular width. These findings need to be refined by further studies assessing the smallest detectable difference in capsular width, with attention to reliability of interobserver observations.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an increased capsular width evidenced by ultrasound (US) could be an indirect marker of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) effusion. METHODS: 138 TMJs were evaluated by US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by two blinded calibrated investigators. US measures of capsular width (in mm) and MRI diagnosis of TMJ effusion (presence/absence) were used to perform a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in order to assess the most accurate cut-off value of capsular width that was able to discriminate between joints with and without MRI effusion. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy of US to detect MRI-depicted TMJ effusion was good (area under the ROC curve=0.817). US sensitivity was high for values below the cut-off value of 1.950 mm (true positive rate (TPR)=83.9%; false positive rate (FPR)=26.3%), while specificity was high for values above the cut-off value of 2.150 mm (TPR=71.0%; FPR=11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of ROC curve appears to reveal that the critical area is around the 2 mm value for TMJ capsular width. These findings need to be refined by further studies assessing the smallest detectable difference in capsular width, with attention to reliability of interobserver observations.
Authors: Eva Kirkhus; Ragnhild B Gunderson; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Berit Flatø; Siri O Hetlevik; Tore A Larheim; Linda Z Arvidsson Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.419