Literature DB >> 15070604

The prognostic importance of tumor mitotic rate confirmed in 1317 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and long follow-up.

Anne Brecht Francken1, Helen M Shaw, John F Thompson, Seng-jaw Soong, Neil A Accortt, Manuela F Azzola, Richard A Scolyer, Gerald W Milton, William H McCarthy, Marjorie H Colman, Vincent J McGovern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The late Dr. Vincent McGovern (1915 to 1983) was an international authority on melanoma pathology and one of the first to suggest that assessment of tumor mitotic rate (TMR) might provide useful prognostic information. Data for a large cohort of patients, now with extended follow-up, whose tumors had been assessed by Dr. McGovern were analyzed to reassess the independent prognostic value of TMR in primary localized, cutaneous melanoma.
METHODS: Information was extracted from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for 1317 patients treated between 1957 and 1982 for whom there was complete clinical information and whose primary lesion pathology, which included tumor thickness, ulcerative state, and TMR, had been assessed by Dr. McGovern. All these assessments were made according to the recommendations of the Eighth International Pigment Cell Conference, held in Sydney in 1972 under the auspices of the International Union Against Cancer. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: Stage, according to the recently revised American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System (which is based on tumor thickness and ulceration) was the most predictive factor for survival (P<.0001). This was followed by primary lesion site (P<.0001), patient age (P=.0005), and TMR (P=.008).
CONCLUSIONS: TMR was confirmed to be an important independent predictor of survival of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. However, its predictive value was less than it was when assessed according to the 1982 revisions of the 1972 TMR recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070604     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2004.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Seng-Jaw Soong; Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shouluan Ding; Daniel G Coit; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy Johnson; Marcella M Johnson; Stanley P Leong; Merrick I Ross; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M Eggermont; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Shukui Qin; Jun Liang; Tongyu Lin; Lu Si; Xiaohong Chen; Zhihong Chi; Chuanliang Cui; Nan Du; Yun Fan; Kangsheng Gu; Fang Li; Junling Li; Yongheng Li; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Man Lu; Aiping Lu; Kejun Nan; Xiaohui Niu; Hongming Pan; Guoxin Ren; Xiubao Ren; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Min Tao; Baocheng Wang; Wenbin Wei; Di Wu; Lingying Wu; Aiwen Wu; Xiaolin Xu; Junyi Zhang; Xiaoshi Zhang; Yiping Zhang; Huiyan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Antineoplastic effects of Rhodiola crenulata treatment on B16-F10 melanoma.

Authors:  Maxine C Dudek; Kaitlyn E Wong; Lotfi M Bassa; Maria Carmen Mora; Jennifer Ser-Dolansky; Jean M Henneberry; Giovanna M Crisi; Richard B Arenas; Sallie S Schneider
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 4.  Evolving concepts in melanoma classification and their relevance to multidisciplinary melanoma patient care.

Authors:  Richard A Scolyer; Georgina V Long; John F Thompson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Shouluan Ding; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Alexander M Eggermont; Timothy Johnson; John M Kirkwood; Stanley P Leong; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pitfalls and important issues in the pathologic diagnosis of melanocytic tumors.

Authors:  Stanley W McCarthy; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

7.  Mitotic rate in melanoma: prognostic value of immunostaining and computer-assisted image analysis.

Authors:  Christopher S Hale; Meng Qian; Michelle W Ma; Patrick Scanlon; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Yongzhao Shao; David Polsky; Iman Osman; Farbod Darvishian
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Ki-67 expression is superior to mitotic count and novel proliferation markers PHH3, MCM4 and mitosin as a prognostic factor in thick cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Rita G Ladstein; Ingeborg M Bachmann; Oddbjørn Straume; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Histopathology report of cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node in Europe: a web-based survey by the Dermatopathology Working Group of the European Society of Pathology.

Authors:  Anna Batistatou; Martin G Cook; Daniela Massi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Biomarkers in melanoma.

Authors:  H Gogas; A M M Eggermont; A Hauschild; P Hersey; P Mohr; D Schadendorf; A Spatz; R Dummer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.