Literature DB >> 15070195

Non-invasive assessment of radiation injury with electrical impedance spectroscopy.

K Sunshine Osterman1, P Jack Hoopes, Christine DeLorenzo, David J Gladstone, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

A detailed understanding of non-targeted normal tissue response is necessary for the optimization of radiation treatment plans in cancer therapy. In this study, we evaluate the ability of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to non-invasively determine and quantify the injury response in soft tissue after high dose rate (HDR) irradiation, which is characterized by large localized dose distributions possessing steep spatial gradients. The HDR after-loading technique was employed to irradiate small volumes of muscle tissue with single doses (26-52 Gy targeted 5 mm away from the source). Impedance measurements were performed on 29 rats at 1, 2 and 3 month post-irradiation, employing 31 frequencies in the 1 kHz to 1 MHz range. Over the first 3 months, conductivity increased by 48% and 26% following target doses of 52 Gy and 26 Gy 5 mm from the HDR source, respectively. Injury, assessed independently through a grid-based scoring method showed a quadratic dependence on distance from source. A significant injury (50% of cells atrophied, necrotic or degenerating) in 1.2% of the volume, accompanied by more diffuse injury (25% of cells atrophied, necrotic or degenerating) in 9% of the tissue produced a conductivity increase of 0.02 S m(-1) (8% over a baseline of 0.24 S m(-1)). This was not statistically significant at p = 0.01. Among treatment groups, injury differences in 22% of the volume led to statistically significant differences in conductivity of 0.07 S m(-1) (23% difference in conductivity). Despite limitations, the success of EIS in detecting responses in a fraction of the tissue probed, during these early post-irradiation time-points, is encouraging. Electrical impedance spectroscopy may provide a useful metric of atrophy and the development of fibrosis secondary to radiation that could be further developed into a low-cost imaging method for radiotherapy monitoring and assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070195     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/5/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Laser biostimulation of wound healing: bioimpedance measurements support histology.

Authors:  Hakan Solmaz; Sergulen Dervisoglu; Murat Gulsoy; Yekta Ulgen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Tissue permittivity: a monitor for progressive tissue fibrosis as observed in bystander tissues following experimental high dose rate irradiation.

Authors:  Christina Skourou; P Jack Hoopes; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Study of Biological Tissues.

Authors:  D A Dean; T Ramanathan; D Machado; R Sundararajan
Journal:  J Electrostat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.775

4.  Applications of Bioimpedance Measurement Techniques in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  M Amini; J Hisdal; H Kalvøy
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2018-12-31

5.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy as electrical biopsy for monitoring radiation sequelae of intestine in rats.

Authors:  Pei-Ju Chao; Eng-Yen Huang; Kuo-Sheng Cheng; Yu-Jie Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A predictive model of radiation-related fibrosis based on the radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Rongjie Liu; Yu Zhao; Chonnipa Nantavithya; Hesham Elhalawani; Hongtu Zhu; Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed; Clifton David Fuller; Danita Kannarunimit; Pei Yang; Hong Zhu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.