Literature DB >> 1506944

Yield of the screening review of systems: a study on a general medical service.

T L Mitchell1, J L Tornelli, T D Fisher, T A Blackwell, J R Moorman.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of screening reviews of the cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal systems during medical admissions.
DESIGN: Case series.
SETTING: General internal medicine ward of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 550 consecutive medical patients were initially screened at admission. The authors excluded 265 patients with life-limiting medical conditions, and they studied 98 patients with no known cardiopulmonary disease and 207 patients with no known gastrointestinal disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Positive responses to screening systems review questions were evaluated using a standardized testing algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of new diagnoses; potential for patient benefit. MAIN
RESULTS: The authors made 26 new diagnoses for 25 patients (95% confidence limits, 16 to 37 patients), two of whom may have gained years of life as a result.
CONCLUSIONS: The absolute yield of the screening cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal reviews of systems of 550 patients admitted to an internal medicine service of a university hospital was a new diagnosis in about 5% of patients. An estimate of the cost-effectiveness compares favorably with those of other accepted screening practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1506944     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  13 in total

1.  DIAGNOSTIC PROCESS.

Authors:  D L CROMBIE
Journal:  J Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1963-11

Review 2.  The language of attentive patient care: a comparison of two medical interviews.

Authors:  E G Mishler; J A Clark; J Ingelfinger; M P Simon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The diagnostic value of the medical history. Perceptions of internal medicine physicians.

Authors:  E C Rich; T W Crowson; I B Harris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-11

4.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

5.  Clinical hypocompetence: the interview.

Authors:  F W Platt; J C McMath
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests.

Authors:  G Sandler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Long-term results of prospective randomised study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris. European Coronary Surgery Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Pryor; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; R A Rosati
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  The yield of the routine admission electrocardiogram. A study in a general medical service.

Authors:  J R Moorman; M A Hlatky; D M Eddy; G S Wagner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Talking to patients.

Authors:  E B Larson; M Ramsbottom-Lucier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.