Literature DB >> 15069179

Centre-specific variation in renal transplant outcomes in Canada.

S Joseph Kim1, Douglas E Schaubel, John R Jeffery, Stanley S A Fenton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 'centre effect' has accounted for significant variation in renal allograft outcomes in the United States and Europe. To determine whether similar variation exists in Canada, we analysed mortality and graft failure (GF) rates among Canadian end-stage renal disease patients who received a renal allograft from 1988 to 1997 (n = 5082) across 20 transplant centres.
METHODS: Patients were followed from the date of transplantation to the time of GF and/or death. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate mortality and GF hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for relevant covariates, including centre volume. Centre-specific HRs were derived by comparing each centre's outcome rates against all others.
RESULTS: Twenty centres were included in the analysis. There was significant centre-specific variation in recipient and transplant characteristics (e.g. age, diabetes mellitus, donor source and centre volume) as well as covariate-adjusted facility-specific outcome rates. Facility-specific HRs for GF (including death with a functioning graft) ranged from 0.51 to 1.77, while mortality HRs (including death beyond GF) showed a similar spread (0.44-1.84). These HRs represent a 3- to 4-fold difference in transplant outcomes among the 20 centres studied. Centres performing less than 200 transplants over the study period were associated with lower graft and patient survival.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate significant centre-specific variation in the success of renal transplantation in Canada. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causes of this variation, with the goal of developing strategies to minimize the centre effect and ensure the best possible outcomes for all renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15069179     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  6 in total

1.  Survival and hospitalization for intensive home hemodialysis compared with kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; S Joseph Kim; Heather J Baer; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  "Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel W Louvar; Na Li; Jon Snyder; Yi Peng; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Organ donation and transplantation in Canada: insights from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register.

Authors:  Sang Joseph Kim; Stanley Sa Fenton; Joanne Kappel; Louise M Moist; Scott W Klarenbach; Susan M Samuel; Lianne G Singer; Daniel H Kim; Kimberly Young; Greg Webster; Juliana Wu; Frank Ivis; Eric de Sa; John S Gill
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2014-12-09

4.  The Effect of Transplant Volume and Patient Case Mix on Center Variation in Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.

Authors:  Anne Tsampalieros; Dean Fergusson; Stephanie Dixon; Shane W English; Douglas Manuel; Carl Van Walraven; Monica Taljaard; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-09-20

5.  Center Variation and the Effect of Center and Provider Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Anne Tsampalieros; Gregory A Knoll; Nicholas Fergusson; Alexandria Bennett; Monica Taljaard; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2017-10-19

6.  Case Mix, Patterns of Care, and Inpatient Outcomes Among Ontario Kidney Transplant Centers: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Anne Tsampalieros; Greg A Knoll; Stephanie Dixon; Shane English; Douglas Manuel; Carl Van Walraven; Monica Taljaard; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2018-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.