Literature DB >> 15069112

Intermediate end point for prostate cancer-specific mortality following salvage hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen failure.

Anthony V D'Amico1, Judd W Moul, Peter R Carroll, Kerri Cote, Leon Sun, Deborah Lubeck, Andrew A Renshaw, Marian Loffredo, Ming-Hui Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response to salvage hormonal therapy can act as an intermediate end point for prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated whether PSA response, defined as the absolute value of the ratio of the rate of PSA change after salvage hormonal therapy to the rate of PSA change before salvage therapy, is associated with the time to PCSM following salvage hormonal therapy.
METHODS: A single-institution and two pooled multi-institution databases containing baseline, treatment, and follow-up information on men who received salvage hormonal therapy for PSA failure following surgery or radiation therapy from January 1, 1988, to January 1, 2002, formed the study (n = 199) and validation cohorts (n = 1255), respectively. The ability of PSA response and its constituents (i.e., pre-salvage hormonal therapy PSA slope and post-salvage hormonal therapy PSA slope) to predict time to PCSM following salvage hormonal therapy was assessed using Cox regression analysis. For illustrative purposes, PSA response was analyzed as a dichotomous variable with a breakpoint for the ratio of PSA response of 1. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: PSA response was statistically significantly associated with time to PCSM following salvage hormonal therapy in both the study (P(Cox) =.0014) and validation (P(Cox)<.001) cohorts; however, its constituents were not (pre-salvage hormonal therapy PSA slope: P(Cox-study) =.97, P(Cox-validation) =.57; post-salvage hormonal therapy PSA slope: P(Cox-study) =.27, P(Cox-validation) =.31). Patients with a PSA response that was less than or equal to 1 had a statistically significantly shorter time to PCSM than patients with a PSA response of greater than 1 in both the study (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 10.3; P(Cox) =.01) and validation (HR = 12.8, 95% CI = 6.2 to 26.3; P(Cox)<.001) cohorts.
CONCLUSION: The PSA response to salvage hormonal therapy can serve as an intermediate end point for PCSM in patients with a rising PSA level following surgery or radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15069112     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  7 in total

Review 1.  [PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy--local or systemic? When is a second curative therapy still possible?].

Authors:  M P Wirth; F M Engelhardt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Monitoring response, prediction methodology, staging, and imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Pomerantz; Nicholas Vogelzang
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

3.  Hormone use after radiotherapy failure: a survey of Canadian uro-oncology specialists.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; Tom Pickles; Patrick C Cheung; Himu Lukka; Sergio Faria; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Prostate cancer clinical trial end points: "RECIST"ing a step backwards.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; William K Kelly; Lawrence H Schwartz; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Timing of curative treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Peter C Albertsen; Chris H Bangma; Stephen J Freedland; Markus Graefen; Andrew Vickers; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Early observed transient prostate-specific antigen elevations on a pilot study of external beam radiation therapy and fractionated MRI guided high dose rate brachytherapy boost.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Peter Guion; Robert C Susil; Deborah E Citrin; Holly Ning; Robert W Miller; Karen Ullman; Sharon Smith; Nancy Sears Crouse; Denise J Godette; Bronwyn R Stall; C Norman Coleman; Kevin Camphausen; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Hormone naïve prostate cancer: predicting and maximizing response intervals.

Authors:  Judd W Moul
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.