| Literature DB >> 15068840 |
Judith E Epstein1, Yupin Charoenvit, Kent E Kester, Ruobing Wang, Rhonda Newcomer, Steve Fitzpatrick, Thomas L Richie, Nadia Tornieporth, D Gray Heppner, Chris Ockenhouse, Victoria Majam, Carolyn Holland, Esteban Abot, Harini Ganeshan, Mara Berzins, Trevor Jones, C Nicole Freydberg, Jennifer Ng, Jon Norman, Daniel J Carucci, Joe Cohen, Stephen L Hoffman.
Abstract
Optimal protection against malaria may require induction of high levels of protective antibody and CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell responses. In humans, malaria DNA vaccines elicit CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells (CTL) and IFNgamma responses as measured by short-term (ex vivo) ELISPOT assays, and recombinant proteins elicit antibodies and excellent T cell responses, but no CD8(+) CTL or CD8(+) IFNgamma-producing cells as measured by ex vivo ELISPOT. Priming with DNA and boosting with recombinant pox virus elicits much better T cell responses than DNA alone, but not antibody responses. In an attempt to elicit antibodies and enhanced T cell responses, we administered RTS,S/AS02A, a partially protective Plasmodium falciparum recombinant circumsporozoite protein (CSP) vaccine in adjuvant, to volunteers previously immunized with a P. falciparum CSP DNA vaccine (VCL-2510) and to naïve volunteers. This vaccine regimen was well tolerated and safe. The volunteers who received RTS,S/AS02A alone had, as expected, antibody and CD4(+) T cell responses, but no CD8(+) T cell responses. Volunteers who received PfCSP DNA followed by RTS,S/AS02A had antibody and CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell responses (Wang et al., submitted). Sequential immunization with DNA and recombinant protein, also called heterologous prime-boost, led to enhanced immune responses as compared to DNA or recombinant protein alone, suggesting that it might provide enhanced protective immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15068840 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641