Literature DB >> 15068592

The role of spared calcarine cortex and lateral occipital cortex in the responses of human hemianopes to visual motion.

Antony B Morland1, Sandra Lê, Erin Carroll, Michael B Hoffmann, Alidz Pambakian.   

Abstract

Some patients, who are rendered perimetrically blind in one hemifield by cortical lesions, nevertheless exhibit residual visual capacities within their field defects. The neural mechanism that mediates the residual visual responses has remained the topic of considerable debate. One explanation posits the subcortical visual pathways that bypass the primary visual cortex and innervate the extrastriate visual areas as the substrate that underlies the residual vision. The other explanation is that small islands of the primary visual cortex remain intact and provide the signals for residual vision. We have performed behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments to investigate the validity of the two explanations of residual vision. Our behavioral experiments indicated that of the seven hemianopes tested, two had the ability to discriminate the direction of a drifting grating. This residual visual response was shown with fMRI to be the result of spared islands of calcarine cortical activity in one of the hemianopes, whereas only lateral occipital activity was documented in the other patient. These results indicate that the underlying neural correlates of residual vision can vary between patients. Moreover, our study emphasizes the necessity of ruling out the presence of islands of preserved function and primary visual cortex before assigning residual visual capacities to the properties of visual pathways that bypass the primary visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15068592     DOI: 10.1162/089892904322984517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Amalia Papanikolaou; Georgios A Keliris; T Dorina Papageorgiou; Ulrich Schiefer; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Visual cortical activity reflects faster accumulation of information from cortically blind fields.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Anasuya Das; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Isoluminant coloured stimuli are undetectable in blindsight even when they move.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Alan Cowey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield.

Authors:  L Henriksson; A Raninen; R Näsänen; L Hyvärinen; S Vanni
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Visual activation of extra-striate cortex in the absence of V1 activation.

Authors:  Holly Bridge; Stephen L Hicks; Jingyi Xie; Thomas W Okell; Sabira Mannan; Iona Alexander; Alan Cowey; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The anatomy of blindsight.

Authors:  Geraint Rees
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Neural activity within area V1 reflects unconscious visual performance in a case of blindsight.

Authors:  Petya D Radoeva; Sashank Prasad; David H Brainard; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Blindsight and Unconscious Vision: What They Teach Us about the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Sara Ajina; Holly Bridge
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Task-irrelevant blindsight and the impact of invisible stimuli.

Authors:  Petra Stoerig
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-09

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Tiziana Usai
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.