Literature DB >> 15067656

A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers.

Dominik Parsch1, Caroline Diehm, Andrew M R New, Sven Schneider, Steffen J Breusch.   

Abstract

In this cadaver study, we compared 2 different acetabular cement pressurizers (Exeter and Bernoski type) in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding. Pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular pressures during pressurization. Anteroposterior radiographs of the entire specimens were taken. Subsequently, standardized 3-mm-thick sections were cut through the acetabula, which were then microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration. Adequate pressurization was obtained with either pressurizer. The peak and sustained pressures obtained with the Exeter pressurizer (peak, 80 kPa; sustained, 38 kPa) tended to be higher than the pressures obtained with the Bernoski pressurizer (73 kPa; 24 kPa; P > 0.05). Accordingly, a tendency toward improved cement penetration into cancellous bone was found using the Exeter pressurizer (P >.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15067656     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Modified femoral pressuriser generates a longer lasting high pressure during cement pressurisation.

Authors:  Jian-Sheng Wang; Göran Garellick; Fred Kjellson; Elizabeth Tanner; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  In vitro measurement of temperature changes during implantation of cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Guido Pape; Sebastian Jäger; Markus Loew; Rudi Bitsch; Markus Rickert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation.

Authors:  Alexander T Boote; David J Deehan; Kenneth S Rankin; David C Swailes; Philip J Hyde
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.405

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.