Literature DB >> 15067027

Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis.

Leonard L Gunderson1, Daniel J Sargent, Joel E Tepper, Norman Wolmark, Michael J O'Connell, Mirsada Begovic, Cristine Allmer, Linda Colangelo, Steven R Smalley, Daniel G Haller, James A Martenson, Robert J Mayer, Tyvin A Rich, Jaffer A Ajani, John S MacDonald, Christopher G Willett, Richard M Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine survival and relapse rates by T and N stage and treatment method in five randomized phase III North American rectal adjuvant studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from 3,791 eligible patients enrolled onto North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) 79-47-51, NCCTG 86-47-51, US Gastrointestinal Intergroup 0114, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R01, and NSABP R02. Surgery alone (S) was the treatment arm in 179 patients. The remaining patients received adjuvant treatment as follows: irradiation (RT) alone (n = 281), RT + fluorouracil (FU) +/- semustine bolus chemotherapy (CT; n = 779), RT + protracted venous infusion CT (n = 325), RT + FU +/- leucovorin or levamisole bolus CT (n = 1,695), or CT alone (n = 532). Five-year follow-up was available in 94% of surviving patients, and 8-year follow-up, in 62%.
RESULTS: Overall (OS) and disease-free survival were dependent on TN stage, NT stage, and treatment method. Even among N2 patients, T substage influenced 5-year OS (T1-2, 67%; T3, 44%; T4, 37%; P <.001). Three risk groups of patients were defined: (1) intermediate (T1-2/N1, T3/N0), (2) moderately high (T1-2/N2, T3/N1, T4/N0), and (3) high (T3/N2, T4/N1, T4/N2). For intermediate-risk patients, those receiving S plus CT had 5-year OS rates of 85% (T1-2/N1) and 84% (T3/N0), which was similar to results with S plus RT plus CT (T1-2/N1, 78% to 83%; T3/N0, 74% to 80%). For moderately high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 43% to 70% with S plus CT, and 44% to 80% with S plus RT plus CT. For high-risk lesions, 5-year OS ranged from 25% to 45% with S plus CT, and 29% to 57% with S plus RT plus CT.
CONCLUSION: Different treatment strategies may be indicated for intermediate-risk versus moderately high- or high-risk patients based on differential survival rates and rates of relapse. Use of trimodality treatment for all patients with intermediate-risk lesions may be excessive, since S plus CT resulted in 5-year OS of approximately 85%; however, 5-year disease-free survival rates with S plus CT were 78% (T1-2/N1) and 69%(T3/N0), indicating room for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15067027     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  108 in total

1.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following total mesorectal excision for stage IIA rectal cancer: is it beneficial?

Authors:  Jin Soo Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min; Hyuk Hur; Joong Bae Ahn; Ki Chang Keum
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary management in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Asunción Hervás Morón; María Luisa García de Paredes; Eduardo Lobo Martínez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Patterns of lymph node metastasis are different in colon and rectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Xian-Zhao Wei; Chuan-Gang Fu; Rong-Hua Zhao; Fu-Ao Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Is it needed?

Authors:  Kristijonas Milinis; Michael Thornton; Amir Montazeri; Paul S Rooney
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

5.  Factors associated with the location of local rectal cancer recurrence and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Peng Du; John P Burke; Wisam Khoury; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; David W Dietz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Rectal cancer treatment: improving the picture.

Authors:  Juan A Diaz-Gonzalez; Leire Arbea; Javier Aristu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy in stage T3, N0 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deniz Tural; Fatih Selcukbiricik; Özcan Yıldız; Olgun Elcin; Sibel Erdamar; Sabri Güney; Fuat Demireli; Evin Büyükünal; Süheyla Serdengeçti
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mapping of lateral pelvic lymph node recurrences in rectal cancer: a radiation oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Seo Hee Choi; Jee Suk Chang; Hong In Yoon; Dong-Su Jang; Nam Kyu Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Byung So Min; Hyuk Huh; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Getting knit-PI3Ky: PIK3CA mutation status to direct multimodality therapy?

Authors:  Andrea P Myers; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.