Literature DB >> 15063479

Are all estrogens the same?

Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink1.   

Abstract

This paper focuses on the question whether different estrogens (E) have different qualitative pharmacodynamic effects when used by women for contraception, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) or prevention of osteoporosis. In this context estrogens have been defined as the estrogen agonists estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estriol (E3), conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), diethylstilbestrol (DES) and ethinylestradiol (EE). Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator's (SERM's) have been excluded from this analysis primarily because of lack of comparative (clinical) data with estrogen agonists. A major problem when addressing the issue of comparability of estrogen agonists is the lack of data from head-to-head estrogen-only comparative studies. Comparative studies have been performed almost exclusively with estrogen agonists combined with a series of different progestogens (P), that have been added to protect the uterus from endometrial hyperplasia. Since progestogens are known to exhibit different intrinsic pharmacodynamic properties and interactions with estrogens, it is impossible to judge which role the estrogen plays when qualitative differences between different combined E/P preparations are observed. In summary, no convincing evidence has been found that the estrogens mentioned differ qualitatively. Obviously quantitative differences are present due to differences in e.g. receptor affinity, metabolism (half life) and route of administration (transdermal/vaginal). Since DES has been discarded for human use due to teratogenicity, EE used in all combined E/P oral contraceptives is the most potent estrogen agonist available at present. In HRT, E2 and CEE are equally effective for the treatment of hot flushes and urogenital atrophy and superior to any other treatment option. For long term treatment to prevent osteoporosis and even for short term HRT, estrogen agonists are heavily debated recently because of a small increased risk of breast cancer, that has been known for a long time already. Well informed and individualised choice of treatment seems the appropriate solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15063479     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Estrogen and P2 Purinergic Receptor Systems in Microglia: Therapeutic Targets for Neuroprotection.

Authors:  Jessica M Crain; Jyoti J Watters
Journal:  Open Drug Discov J       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 2.  Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Carey Gleason; Sanjay Asthana
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Effects of Oral vs Transdermal Estrogen Therapy on Sexual Function in Early Postmenopause: Ancillary Study of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS).

Authors:  Hugh S Taylor; Aya Tal; Lubna Pal; Fangyong Li; Dennis M Black; Eliot A Brinton; Matthew J Budoff; Marcelle I Cedars; Wei Du; Howard N Hodis; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; George R Merriam; Virginia M Miller; Frederick Naftolin; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Nanette F Santoro; Sherman M Harman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Effects of diethylstilbestrol in human lymphocytes in vitro: a dose and time-dependent study on genotoxic, cytotoxic and apoptotic effects.

Authors:  Ece Konac; Abdullah Ekmekci; Vahid Barkar; Akin Yilmaz; Deniz Erbas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Asymmetric development of the male mouse mammary gland and its response to a prenatal or postnatal estrogen challenge.

Authors:  Aastha Pokharel; SriDurgaDevi Kolla; Klara Matouskova; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 6.  Estrogen and thrombosis: A bench to bedside review.

Authors:  Mouhamed Yazan Abou-Ismail; Divyaswathi Citla Sridhar; Lalitha Nayak
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Effect of a low-dose contraceptive patch on efficacy, bleeding pattern, and safety: a 1-year, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Susana Bassol; Edith Weisberg; Uwe Mellinger; Martin Merz
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Exploratory comparison of vaginal glycogen and Lactobacillus levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Paria Mirmonsef; Sharada Modur; Derick Burgad; Douglas Gilbert; Elizabeth T Golub; Audrey L French; Kerrie McCotter; Alan L Landay; Greg T Spear
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ethinyl estradiol and gestodene, administered as a transdermal fertility control patch, and two CYP3A4 inhibitors and a CYP3A4 substrate.

Authors:  Julia Winkler; Mark Goldammer; Matthias Ludwig; Beate Rohde; Christian Zurth
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 2.441

10.  Premarin improves memory, prevents scopolamine-induced amnesia and increases number of basal forebrain choline acetyltransferase positive cells in middle-aged surgically menopausal rats.

Authors:  Jazmin I Acosta; Loretta Mayer; Joshua S Talboom; Cynthia Zay; Melissa Scheldrup; Jonathan Castillo; Laurence M Demers; Craig K Enders; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.