Literature DB >> 1506301

Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: I. Breed effects.

L L Lo1, D G McLaren, F K McKeith, R L Fernando, J Novakofski.   

Abstract

Knowledge of breed effects on carcass and pork quality traits is required to develop commercial crossbreeding programs that emphasize product quality. A 2 x 2 diallel mating system involving Landrace and Duroc pigs was used to estimate individual heterosis, direct breed effects and reciprocal cross differences for post-weaning growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits. Data from 5,649 pigs and 960 carcasses representing 65 and 49 sires, respectively, were analyzed assuming animal models. Duroc-sired pigs had 2.1 cm shorter carcasses with 7.3 mm less 10th rib backfat (BF), 4.4 cm2 larger longissimus muscle area (LMA), yielded 2.1 kg more estimated fat standardized lean (FSL), gained 16.5 g more estimated lean per day of age (LDOA), and had 1.0% less water (PWAT) and 1.9% more intramuscular fat (IMF) in the longissimus muscle than did Landrace-sired pigs (P less than .01), adjusted to an off-farm live weight of 111 kg. Reciprocal cross differences were detected for BF, LMA, FSL, LDOA and for subjective marbling, firmness, and muscling scores (P less than .01). Durocsired F1 barrows had 6.3 mm less BF and 5.9 cm2 larger LMA, yielded 3.2 kg more FSL, gained 22.3 g more LDOA, and had less marbling in the longissimus muscle and heavier ham muscling than reciprocal cross barrows. Heterosis estimates (P less than .05) were 27.6 g/d (3.2%) for ADG, -5.8 d (-3.6%) for off-test age, 2.7 cm (3.4%) for carcass length, 1.5 kg (7.2%) for FSL, 14.7 g (5.7%) for LDOA, -.07 (-3.6%) for muscle color, -.5% (-13.2%) for IMF, and .3% (.3%) for PWAT. Breed effects were not detected (P greater than .10) for muscle pH, cooking loss, shear value, and water-holding capacity or for eating quality traits. Reciprocal cross differences suggest an advantage in using the Duroc as a terminal sire, but improved carcass composition and higher intramuscular fat did not seem to affect eating quality traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1506301     DOI: 10.2527/1992.7082373x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Analyses of porcine public SNPs in coding-gene regions by re-sequencing and phenotypic association studies.

Authors:  Xiaoping Li; Sang-Wook Kim; Kyoung-Tag Do; You-Kyoung Ha; Yun-Mi Lee; Suk-Hee Yoon; Hee-Bal Kim; Jong-Joo Kim; Bong-Hwan Choi; Kwan-Suk Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Investigation of porcine FABP3 and LEPR gene polymorphisms and mRNA expression for variation in intramuscular fat content.

Authors:  Xiaoping Li; Sang-Wook Kim; Jung-Suck Choi; Yoon-Mi Lee; Cheol-Koo Lee; Bong-Hwan Choi; Tae-Hun Kim; Yang-Il Choi; Jong-Joo Kim; Kwan-Suk Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Genomics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in purebred and crossbred sows: antibody response and performance following natural infection vs. vaccination.

Authors:  Leticia P Sanglard; Felipe M W Hickmann; Yijian Huang; Kent A Gray; Daniel C L Linhares; Jack C M Dekkers; Megan C Niederwerder; Rohan L Fernando; Joseph Braccini Neto; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Comparison of pork quality and sensory characteristics for antibiotic free yorkshire crossbreds raised in hoop houses.

Authors:  N Whitley; D Hanson; W Morrow; M T See; S-H Oh
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Pork Quality, Novel Carcass, Primal-Cut and Growth Traits in Duroc Pigs.

Authors:  Hannah E Willson; Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira; Allan P Schinckel; Daniela Grossi; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Comparison of Growth Performance and Meat Quality Traits of Commercial Cross-Bred Pigs versus the Large Black Pig Breed.

Authors:  Yongjie Wang; Keshari Thakali; Palika Morse; Sarah Shelby; Jinglong Chen; Jason Apple; Yan Huang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Processed Meat Characteristics between Commercial Duroc-Sired and Heritage Breed Large Black Pigs.

Authors:  Yufei Guo; Katharine Sharp; Harvey Blackburn; Brian Richert; Kara Stewart; Stacy M S Zuelly
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.