Literature DB >> 15061941

[Effectiveness of personal protective measures in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome].

Wen-wu Yin1, Li-dong Gao, Wei-sheng Lin, Li-dong Gao, Wei-sheng Lin, Lin Du, Xian-chang Zhang, Qin Zou, Ling-hui Li, Wen-jia Liang, Guo-wen Peng, Jian-feng He, De-wen Yu, Duan-hua Zhou, Jin-yan Lin, Guang Zeng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of personal protective measures of health care workers (HCWs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
METHODS: A case-control study from ten hospitals in Guangdong, with 180 non-infected and 77 infected staff members that accessed the isolation unit every day, and participated in direct first aid for severe SARS patients. All participants were surveyed about how they were using personal protective equipment (PPE), protective drugs and hygiene habits when caring for patients with SARS. Statistical analysis was done with either chi(2) or Fisher's exact test for univariate analysis, whereas we used forward stepwise selection (Waldesian) for logistic regression.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that mask, gown, gloves, goggles, footwear, "hand-washing and disinfecting", gargle, "membrane protection", "taking shower and changing clothing after work", "avoid from eating and drinking in ward", oseltamivir phospha tall had protective effects (P < 0.05), but stepwise logistic regression showed significant differences for mask (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.99), goggles (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.41) and footwear (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39 - 0.86). Analysis for linear trend in proportions showed that dose response relationship existed in mask, gown, gloves, goggles, footwear, gargle, "membrane protection" and "taking shower and changing dree after work" (P < 0.01). The attack rate of HCWs who were rescuing severe SARS patients without any PPE was 61.5% (16/26). It seemed that the more the protective measures were used, the higher the protective effect was (P < 0.001), and could reach 100% if mask, gown, gloves, goggles, footwear, "hand-washing and disinfecting" were all used at the same time.
CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial infection of SARS can be prevented effectively by precautions against droplets and personal contact. HCWs must take strict protection according to the guidance of WHO or Chinese MOH and pay attention to personal hygiene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0254-6450


  20 in total

Review 1.  Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Chris B Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Lubna A Al-Ansary; Ghada A Bawazeer; Mieke L van Driel; Sreekumaran Nair; Mark A Jones; Sarah Thorning; John M Conly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

2.  Associations Between Wearing Masks and Respiratory Viral Infections: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yiming Chen; Yuelin Wang; Ningbin Quan; Jun Yang; Yinyin Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Risk factors for SARS transmission from patients requiring intubation: a multicentre investigation in Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Janet Raboud; Altynay Shigayeva; Allison McGeer; Erika Bontovics; Martin Chapman; Denise Gravel; Bonnie Henry; Stephen Lapinsky; Mark Loeb; L Clifford McDonald; Marianna Ofner; Shirley Paton; Donna Reynolds; Damon Scales; Sandy Shen; Andrew Simor; Thomas Stewart; Mary Vearncombe; Dick Zoutman; Karen Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cochrane Review: Interventions for the interruption or reduction of the spread of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Ruth Foxlee; Chris Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Bill Hewak; Adi Prabhala; Sreekumaran Nair; Alessandro Rivetti
Journal:  Evid Based Child Health       Date:  2008-12-10

5.  Cost-effectiveness of surgical mask, N-95 respirator, hand-hygiene and surgical mask with hand hygiene in the prevention of COVID-19: Cost effectiveness analysis from Indian context.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Madhumitha Haridoss; Meenakumari Natarajan; Kathiresan Jeyashree; Manickam Ponnaiah
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.

Authors:  Jos H Verbeek; Blair Rajamaki; Sharea Ijaz; Christina Tikka; Jani H Ruotsalainen; Michael B Edmond; Riitta Sauni; F Selcen Kilinc Balci
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-01

7.  Assessing physicians' in training attitudes and behaviors during the 2009 H1N1 influenza season: a cross-sectional survey of medical students and residents in an urban academic setting.

Authors:  Larissa May; Rebecca Katz; Lindsay Johnston; Megan Sanza; Bruno Petinaux
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 8.  Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Chris Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Lubna A Al-Ansary; Ghada A Bawazeer; Mieke L van Driel; Ruth Foxlee; Alessandro Rivetti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-21

9.  Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.

Authors:  Jos H Verbeek; Blair Rajamaki; Sharea Ijaz; Riitta Sauni; Elaine Toomey; Bronagh Blackwood; Christina Tikka; Jani H Ruotsalainen; F Selcen Kilinc Balci
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 10.  Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Coronavirus Infection in Health Care Workers: A Living Rapid Review.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Tracy Dana; David I Buckley; Shelley Selph; Rongwei Fu; Annette M Totten
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 51.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.