Literature DB >> 15061822

Neurophysiological tests and neuroimaging procedures in non-acute headache: guidelines and recommendations.

G Sandrini1, L Friberg, W Jänig, R Jensen, D Russell, M Sanchez del Rìo, T Sand, J Schoenen, M Buchem, J G van Dijk.   

Abstract

The use of instrumental examinations in headache patients varies widely. In order to evaluate their usefulness, the most common instrumental procedures were evaluated, on the basis of evidence from the literature, by an EFNS Task Force (TF) on neurophysiological tests and imaging procedures in non-acute headache patients. The conclusions of the TF regarding each technique are expressed in the following guidelines for clinical use. 1 Interictal electroencephalography (EEG) is not routinely indicated in the diagnostic evaluation of headache patients. Interictal EEG is, however, indicated if the clinical history suggests a possible diagnosis of epilepsy (differential diagnosis). Ictal EEG could be useful in certain patients suffering from hemiplegic and basilar migraine. 2 Recording of evoked potentials is not recommended for the diagnosis of headache disorders. 3 There is no evidence to justify the recommendation of autonomic tests for the routine clinical examination of headache patients. 4 Manual palpation of pericranial muscles, with standardized palpation pressure, can be recommended for subdividing patient groups but not for diagnosis. Pressure algometry and electromyography (EMG) cannot be recommended as clinical diagnostic tests. 5 In adult and paediatric patients with migraine, with no recent change in attack pattern, no history of seizures, and no other focal neurological signs or symptoms, the routine use of neuroimaging is not warranted. In patients with atypical headache patterns, a history of seizures and/or focal neurological signs or symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be indicated. 6 If attacks can be fully accounted for by the standard headache classification [International Headache Society (IHS)], a positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) and scan will generally be of no further diagnostic value. 7 Nuclear medicine examinations of the cerebral circulation and metabolism can be carried out in subgroups of headache patients for diagnosis and evaluation of complications, when patients experience unusually severe attacks, or when the quality or severity of attacks has changed. 8 Transcranial Doppler examination is not helpful in headache diagnosis. Although many of the examinations described are of little or no value in the clinical setting, most of the tools have a vast potential for further exploring the pathophysiology of headaches and the effects of pharmacological treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061822     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2003.00785.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  15 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging in chronic migraine.

Authors:  Luisa Chiapparini; Stefania Ferraro; Licia Grazzi; Gennaro Bussone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Headache.

Authors:  John E Jordan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Should GPs have direct access to neuroradiological investigation when adults present with headache?

Authors:  David Kernick; Stuart Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Brain Excitability in Tension-Type Headache: a Separate Entity from Migraine?

Authors:  Wei-Ta Chen; Fu-Jung Hsiao; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-01-07

5.  Evidence-Based Guidelines for EEG Utilization at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH).

Authors:  Gretchen L Birbeck; E Chomba; M Atadzhanov; A Haworth; E Mbewe; Evans Mwila Mpabalwani
Journal:  Med J Zambia       Date:  2011

6.  [Headache patients in routine clinical practice. When are additional instrumental examinations indicated?].

Authors:  A May; H C Diener
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  A review of diagnostic and functional imaging in headache.

Authors:  Arne May
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  Headache and cognitive profile in children: a cross-sectional controlled study.

Authors:  Pasquale Parisi; Alberto Verrotti; Maria Chiara Paolino; Antonella Urbano; Mariangela Bernabucci; Rosa Castaldo; Maria Pia Villa
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 9.  New insights into headache: an update on functional and structural imaging findings.

Authors:  Arne May
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Imaging patients with suspected brain tumour: guidance for primary care.

Authors:  David P Kernick; Fayyaz Ahmed; Anish Bahra; Andrew Dowson; Giles Elrington; Manuela Fontebasso; Nicola J Giffin; Sue Lipscombe; Anne MacGregor; Richard Peatfield; Stuart Weatherby; Tom Whitmarsh; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.