Literature DB >> 15060326

Multicenter comparison of processes of care between Stroke Units and conventional care wards in Australia.

Dominique A Cadilhac1, Joeseph Ibrahim, Dora C Pearce, Kathryn J Ogden, John McNeill, Stephen M Davis, Geoffrey A Donnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Approximately 23% of Australian hospitals provide Stroke Units (SUs). Evidence suggests that clinical outcomes are better in SUs than with conventional care. Reasons may include greater adherence to processes of care (PoC). The primary hypothesis was that adherence to selected PoC is greater in SUs than in other acute care models.
METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, single-blinded design. Models of care investigated: SUs, mobile services, and conventional care. Selected PoC were related to care models and participant outcomes. Data were collected at acute hospitalization (median 9 days) and at medians of 8 and 28 weeks after stroke.
RESULTS: 1701 patients were screened from 8 hospitals, 823 were eligible, and 468 participated. Response rate was 96% at final follow-up. Mean age was 73 years (SD 14). Overall PoC adherence rates for individual care models were SU 75%, mobile service 65%, and conventional care 52% (P<0.001). The adjusted odds of participants being alive at discharge if adhering to all or all but 1 PoC was significant (aOR 3.63; 95% CI: 1.04 to 12.66; P=0.043). Important trends at 28 weeks were found for being at home (aOR 3.09; 95% CI: 0.96 to 9.87; P=0.058) and independent (aOR 2.61; 95% CI: 0.96 to 7.10; P=0.061), with complete PoC adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to key PoC was higher in SUs than in other models. For all patients, adherence to PoC was associated with improved mortality at discharge and trends found with independence at home, providing support for the need to increase access to stroke units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060326     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125709.17337.5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Basics of acute stroke treatment].

Authors:  A Haass
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The Stroke Practice Improvement Network: a quasiexperimental trial of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality.

Authors:  Judith A Hinchey; Timothy Shephard; Sarah T Tonn; Robin Ruthazer; Richard C Hermann; Harry P Selker; David M Kent
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score.

Authors:  C Weimar; J Benemann; H-C Diener
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Very early mobilization following acute stroke: Controversies, the unknowns, and a way forward.

Authors:  Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.714

5.  Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict recovery following intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Christian Weimar; Michael Roth; Vera Willig; Panagiotis Kostopoulos; Jens Benemann; Hans-Christoph Diener
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard Urimubenshi; Peter Langhorne; Dominique A Cadilhac; Jeanne N Kagwiza; Olivia Wu
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-10-05

Review 7.  Treating the acute stroke patient as an emergency: current practices and future opportunities.

Authors:  S Davis; K Lees; G Donnan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Quality of acute stroke care in Korea (2008-2014): Retrospective analysis of the nationwide and nonselective data for quality of acute stroke care.

Authors:  Hong-Kyun Park; Seong-Eun Kim; Yong-Jin Cho; Jun Yup Kim; Hyunji Oh; Beom Joon Kim; Jihoon Kang; Keon-Joo Lee; Min Uk Jang; Jong-Moo Park; Kwang-Yeol Park; Kyung Bok Lee; Soo Joo Lee; Ji Sung Lee; Juneyoung Lee; Ki Hwa Yang; Ah Rum Choi; Mi Yeon Kang; Eric E Smith; Philip B Gorelick; Hee-Joon Bae
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-05-24

9.  Benchmarks for acute stroke care delivery.

Authors:  Ruth E Hall; Ferhana Khan; Mark T Bayley; Eriola Asllani; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Christina O'Callaghan; Frank L Silver; Moira K Kapral
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS): evaluating the effectiveness of a strategy to increase the adoption of best evidence practice--protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in acute stroke care.

Authors:  Christine L Paul; Christopher R Levi; Catherine A D'Este; Mark W Parsons; Christopher F Bladin; Richard I Lindley; John R Attia; Frans Henskens; Erin Lalor; Mark Longworth; Sandy Middleton; Annika Ryan; Erin Kerr; Robert W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.