Literature DB >> 15059752

Disparities between public health educational materials and the scientific evidence that smokeless tobacco use causes cancer.

John W Waterbor1, Rex M Adams, Joshua M Robinson, Forrest G Crabtree, Neil A Accortt, Janice Gilliland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: We reviewed 4 dozen health education brochures on the dangers of smokeless tobacco (ST) use, printed between 1981 and 2001 and available to the public in 2002. Collectively, these brochures state that ST use causes oral leukoplakia, other oral conditions, and cancers of the oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, lung, breast, prostate, bladder, and kidney. We then reviewed the scientific literature to determine whether these claims were substantiated.
RESULTS: Only for oral leukoplakia and several oral conditions is the evidence persuasive for causation by ST. The evidence that ST causes oral cancer is very suggestive, whereas the evidence for causation of other cancers is either absent or contradictory.
CONCLUSIONS: Communication of the health risks of using ST must be done accurately and should be data based. Broadening the message to include additional diseases for which the evidence is inadequate could cause the message about true risks, as well as the messenger, to be discounted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15059752     DOI: 10.1207/s15430154jce1901_08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  8 in total

1.  A content analysis of smokeless tobacco coverage in U.S. newspapers and news wires.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Smokeless Tobacco Risk Comparison and Other Debate Messages in the News.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev       Date:  2014-05

3.  Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: an intervention for tobacco control professionals.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Amy L Nyman; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Association between willingness to use snus to quit smoking and perception of relative risk between snus and cigarettes.

Authors:  Karl Erik Lund
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Tobacco harm reduction: an alternative cessation strategy for inveterate smokers.

Authors:  Brad Rodu; William T Godshall
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2006-12-21

6.  You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Carl V Phillips; Constance Wang; Brian Guenzel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Should the health community promote smokeless tobacco (snus) as a harm reduction measure?

Authors:  Coral E Gartner; Wayne D Hall; Simon Chapman; Becky Freeman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Meta-analysis of the relation between European and American smokeless tobacco and oral cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Weitkunat; Edward Sanders; Peter N Lee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.