Literature DB >> 15058677

The effects of social pressure on group recall.

Matthew B Reysen1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, individual subjects worked in conjunction with two perceived group members to recall six 30-item categorized word lists. The perceived group members' recall levels were manipulated to establish either high or low group standards. After participating in the perceived group, subjects completed a surprise final individual recall test that covered all of the presented material. On the basis of the hypothesis that the subjects' performance would be affected by social pressure, it was predicted that subjects working in high-performing groups would recall more words than subjects working in low-performing groups on both the group recall tests and the final individual recall test. These predicted results were observed. Thus, a complete analysis of the group recall environment should include a consideration of conformity theory whereby subjects' memories can be affected by their group members' output levels.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15058677     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Social contagion of memory.

Authors:  H L Roediger; M L Meade; E T Bergman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Transmitting false memories in social groups.

Authors:  Barbara H Basden; Matthew B Reysen; David R Basden
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002

3.  Memory conformity: exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person.

Authors:  D B Wright; G Self; C Justice
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-05

4.  Congruency effects in part-list cuing inhibition.

Authors:  S A Sloman; G H Bower; D Rohrer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Response conformity in recognition testing.

Authors:  D M Schneider; M J Watkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering.

Authors:  Mary Susan Weldon; Krystal D Bellinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?

Authors:  B H Basden; D R Basden; S Bryner; R L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  An examination of trace storage in free recall.

Authors:  N J Slamecka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-04

Review 9.  Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: a persisting enigma in memory research.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation.

Authors:  Jessica M Salerno; Shari Seidman Diamond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect.

Authors:  Glen E Bodner; Elisabeth Musch; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

3.  The effects of social pressure on false memories.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

4.  Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-08-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.