Literature DB >> 15058466

Effects of sample holding time on concentrations of microorganisms in water samples.

Ariamalar Selvakumar1, Michael Borst, Mark Boner, Phil Mallon.   

Abstract

This research investigated the effects of extending the holding time of samples for microbial analysis beyond the standard of 24 hours for purposes such as watershed characterization. Experiments were conducted with both sanitary wastewater and stormwater samples. The refrigerated samples (4 degrees C) were held for up to 9 days before being analyzed for two pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus) and five indicator organisms (total coliform, fecal coliform, fecal streptococcus, enterococcus, and Escherichia coli) by membrane filtration. The concentrations (as colony-forming units per 100 mL) were normalized by log10(transformation and used in subsequent statistical analysis testing for significant differences. The results suggested that the concentrations of microorganisms in water samples analyzed on days 1 and 2 did not vary significantly in 8 of 13 analyses. The results of a field study concluded that the concentration of fecal coliform did not change significantly between 7 hours holding time and greater than 24 hours holding time for fecal coliform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058466     DOI: 10.2175/106143004x141591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Environ Res        ISSN: 1061-4303            Impact factor:   1.946


  5 in total

1.  Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Kristine F Stepenuck; Lois G Wolfson; Barbara W Liukkonen; Jerome M Iles; Timothy S Grant
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Storage of oil field-produced waters alters their chemical and microbiological characteristics.

Authors:  Jordan C Hulecki; Julia M Foght; Phillip M Fedorak
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Effects of field storage method on E. coli concentrations measured in storm water runoff.

Authors:  Daren Harmel; Kevin Wagner; Emily Martin; Doug Smith; Pauline Wanjugi; Terry Gentry; Lucas Gregory; Tina Hendon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray method.

Authors:  Brent T Aulenbach
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice.

Authors:  Orlando J Castellano Realpe; Johanna C Gutiérrez; Deisy A Sierra; Lourdes A Pazmiño Martínez; Yrneh Y Prado Palacios; Gustavo Echeverría; Jacobus H de Waard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.