OBJECTIVE: To assess children with cancer for oral complications using the oral assessment guide (OAG) and ascertain the efficacy of an oral hygiene care regimen in children undergoing chemotherapy and at 1 to 2 weeks postchemotherapy administration. METHODS:Thirty pediatric cancer patients with either leukemia or lymphoma were randomly selected from 3 medical centers. A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the difference between pre- and post-oral hygiene care. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used to analyze the data. The interrater agreement between the nurse and the dentist was calculated using a Kappa score. A paired t test was to examine the difference between pre- and post-oral hygiene care regimen. RESULTS: The OAG scores ranged from 8 to 24. The higher the score, the more severe the oral complications. Ninety-six percent of the participants had a score > or = 9, on the pre-test, 26.7% had an OAG score > or = 12. Oral complications included ulcerated mucous membranes, dry lips, deeper or raspy voice, and oral debris. No scores were > or = 12 on the OAG following the posttest. The oral hygiene care regimen significantly improved oral assessment among patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors postulate that the OAG and oral hygiene care regimen may be clinically useful in improving oral assessment and hygiene in children with cancer during and after chemotherapy, thus decreasing associated infection and enhancing patient comfort.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess children with cancer for oral complications using the oral assessment guide (OAG) and ascertain the efficacy of an oral hygiene care regimen in children undergoing chemotherapy and at 1 to 2 weeks postchemotherapy administration. METHODS: Thirty pediatric cancerpatients with either leukemia or lymphoma were randomly selected from 3 medical centers. A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the difference between pre- and post-oral hygiene care. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used to analyze the data. The interrater agreement between the nurse and the dentist was calculated using a Kappa score. A paired t test was to examine the difference between pre- and post-oral hygiene care regimen. RESULTS: The OAG scores ranged from 8 to 24. The higher the score, the more severe the oral complications. Ninety-six percent of the participants had a score > or = 9, on the pre-test, 26.7% had an OAG score > or = 12. Oral complications included ulcerated mucous membranes, dry lips, deeper or raspy voice, and oral debris. No scores were > or = 12 on the OAG following the posttest. The oral hygiene care regimen significantly improved oral assessment among patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors postulate that the OAG and oral hygiene care regimen may be clinically useful in improving oral assessment and hygiene in children with cancer during and after chemotherapy, thus decreasing associated infection and enhancing patient comfort.
Authors: Deborah Tomlinson; Peter Judd; Eleanor Hendershot; Anne-Marie Maloney; Lillian Sung Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah B McGuire; Janet S Fulton; Jumin Park; Carlton G Brown; M Elvira P Correa; June Eilers; Sharon Elad; Faith Gibson; Loree K Oberle-Edwards; Joanne Bowen; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Caroline Gomes Carvalho; João Batista Medeiros-Filho; Meire Coelho Ferreira Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah B McGuire; Maria Elvira P Correa; Judith Johnson; Patricia Wienandts Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine H L Hong; Luiz Alcino Gueiros; Janet S Fulton; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Abhishek Kandwal; Dimitra Galiti; Jane M Fall-Dickson; Jorgen Johansen; Suzanne Ameringer; Tomoko Kataoka; Dianna Weikel; June Eilers; Vinasha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Rajesh V Lalla; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah Tomlinson; Faith Gibson; Nathaniel Treister; Christina Baggott; Peter Judd; Eleanor Hendershot; Anne-Marie Maloney; John Doyle; Brian Feldman; Lillian Sung Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Paula Maria Maracajá Bezerra; Maria Eduarda Alves Sampaio; Fabio Gomes Dos Santos; Isabella Lima Arrais Ribeiro; Bianca Marques Santiago; Simone Alves de Sousa; Ana Maria Gondim Valença Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Wanessa Miranda-Silva; Wagner Gomes-Silva; Yehuda Zadik; Noam Yarom; Abdul Rahman Al-Azri; Catherine H L Hong; Anura Ariyawardana; Deborah P Saunders; M Elvira Correa; Praveen R Arany; Joanne Bowen; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Wim J E Tissing; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.603