Literature DB >> 15058115

Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: a review of the evidence.

M L Carter1.   

Abstract

This review looks at the evidence for the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in various chronic pain states. Spinal cord stimulation can only be effective when appropriate dorsal column fibres in the spinal cord are preserved and able to be stimulated. Spinal cord stimulation has been shown to have little to offer for patients with some diagnoses. Although 50 to 60% of patients with failed back surgery syndrome obtain significant pain relief with this technique, the strength of the evidence available is insufficient to clearly advocate its use in all patients with this condition. Though limited in quantity and quality, better evidence exists for its use in neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, angina pectoris and critical limb ischaemia. There is a lack of high quality evidence relating to spinal cord stimulation due to difficulties in conducting randomized controlled trials in this area. Serious methodological problems are encountered in blinding, recruitment and assessment in nearly all published trials of spinal cord stimulation. Suggestions regarding appropriate methodologies for trials which would produce better quality evidence are summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058115     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0403200102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Wanru Duan; Eellan Sivanesan; Shuguang Liu; Fei Yang; Zhiyong Chen; Neil C Ford; Xueming Chen; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain - consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society.

Authors:  D E Moulin; A J Clark; I Gilron; M A Ware; C P N Watson; B J Sessle; T Coderre; P K Morley-Forster; J Stinson; A Boulanger; P Peng; G A Finley; P Taenzer; P Squire; D Dion; A Cholkan; A Gilani; A Gordon; J Henry; R Jovey; M Lynch; A Mailis-Gagnon; A Panju; G B Rollman; A Velly
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Comparison of intensity-dependent inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic range neurons by dorsal column and peripheral nerve stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  F Yang; Q Xu; Y-K Cheong; R Shechter; A Sdrulla; S-Q He; V Tiwari; X Dong; P W Wacnik; R Meyer; S N Raja; Y Guan
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ronen Shechter; Fei Yang; Qian Xu; Yong-Kwan Cheong; Shao-Qiu He; Andrei Sdrulla; Alene F Carteret; Paul W Wacnik; Xinzhong Dong; Richard A Meyer; Srinivasa N Raja; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-03-01

6.  Safe direct current stimulation to expand capabilities of neural prostheses.

Authors:  Gene Y Fridman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Appetite suppression and weight loss incidental to spinal cord stimulation for pain relief.

Authors:  Eugene Pereira; Allison Foster
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Transforming pain medicine: adapting to science and society.

Authors:  D Borsook; E Kalso
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.931

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.