Literature DB >> 15057981

Impact on couple relationships of predictive testing for Huntington disease: a longitudinal study.

Fiona Richards1, Katrina Williams.   

Abstract

Since predictive testing has been available for Huntington disease (HD) and similar adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders, research into the psychosocial impact of test results has focussed on those receiving results, and to a lesser extent, on their partners. Few studies have examined the impact of predictive testing on the couple relationship, particularly from the perspective of family systems theory. This longitudinal study compared the level of marital adjustment of 23 couples in which the at-risk partner is undergoing predictive testing for HD (the testing group) with that of 20 couples in which the at-risk partner is not undergoing testing (the non-testing group). Participating couples completed a relationship measure, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, at baseline and on two subsequent occasions. Using non-parametric tests, comparisons were made at each phase between the couple scores of the testing and non-testing groups but no significant differences were found in the levels of marital adjustment. Within the testing group the same comparisons were made for the carrier and non-carrier subgroups, and a significant difference was found at the final phase. There was an increase in the level of marital adjustment for the carrier group and a decrease for the non-carrier group. Together with trends observed in the data, this finding suggests a need for greater attention to be given to the potential impact of predictive testing on the couple relationship. Offering couples pre-result relationship assessment and referral for couple therapy, if warranted, may enhance the quality of professional support during the predictive testing process. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057981     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  7 in total

1.  More appreciation of life or regretting the test? Experiences of living as a mutation carrier of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Anette Hagberg; The-Hung Bui; Elisabeth Winnberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Prenatal testing in Huntington disease: after the test, choices recommence.

Authors:  Hanane Bouchghoul; Stéphane-Françoise Clément; Danièle Vauthier; Cécile Cazeneuve; Sandrine Noel; Marc Dommergues; Delphine Héron; Jacky Nizard; Marcela Gargiulo; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Alpha-1 couples: interpersonal and intrapersonal predictors of spousal communication and stress.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Sara Wienke; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  How do partners find out about the risk of Huntington's disease in couple relationships?

Authors:  Karen Forrest Keenan; Sheila A Simpson; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; David A Alexander; June Semper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetic counseling for FTD/ALS caused by the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide expansion.

Authors:  Jamie C Fong; Anna M Karydas; Jill S Goldman
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  Decision-making about reproductive choices among individuals at-risk for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Deborah Thorne; Jennifer Williamson; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.717

Review 7.  Predictive Genetic Counseling for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.