Literature DB >> 15057884

Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses.

Peter C Austin1, Lawrence J Brunner.   

Abstract

This paper demonstrates an inflation of the type I error rate that occurs when testing the statistical significance of a continuous risk factor after adjusting for a correlated continuous confounding variable that has been divided into a categorical variable. We used Monte Carlo simulation methods to assess the inflation of the type I error rate when testing the statistical significance of a risk factor after adjusting for a continuous confounding variable that has been divided into categories. We found that the inflation of the type I error rate increases with increasing sample size, as the correlation between the risk factor and the confounding variable increases, and with a decrease in the number of categories into which the confounder is divided. Even when the confounder is divided in a five-level categorical variable, the inflation of the type I error rate remained high when both the sample size and the correlation between the risk factor and the confounder were high. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057884     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  48 in total

1.  Associations between child sexual abuse and negative sexual experiences and revictimization among women: does measuring severity matter?

Authors:  Tamra B Loeb; Tommi Gaines; Gail E Wyatt; Muyu Zhang; Honghu Liu
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2011-11-10

2.  A graphical method for assessing risk factor threshold values using the generalized additive model: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Claude Messan Setodji; Maren Scheuner; James S Pankow; Roger S Blumenthal; Haiying Chen; Emmett Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

4.  Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Shinya Sakai; Kuriko Kobayashi; Shin-ichi Toyabe; Nozomu Mandai; Tatsuo Kanda; Kohei Akazawa
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Pooling dietary data using questionnaires with open-ended and predefined responses: implications for comparing mean intake or estimating odds ratios.

Authors:  Michael D Swartz; Michele R Forman; Somdat Mahabir; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Adjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confounding.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Olaf H Klungel; Douglas G Altman; Yolanda van der Graaf; Arno W Hoes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Training Load and Its Role in Injury Prevention, Part 2: Conceptual and Methodologic Pitfalls.

Authors:  Franco M Impellizzeri; Alan McCall; Patrick Ward; Luke Bornn; Aaron J Coutts
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Breast density scales: the metric matters.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdolell; Kaitlyn M Tsuruda; Peter Brown; Judy S Caines; Sian E Iles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.

Authors:  A Carmona-Bayonas; P Jimenez-Fonseca; A Fernández-Somoano; F Álvarez-Manceñido; E Castañón; A Custodio; F A de la Peña; R M Payo; L P Valiente
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Predicting the risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women presenting with vaginal bleeding: the Norwich DEFAB risk assessment tool.

Authors:  N Burbos; P Musonda; I Giarenis; A M Shiner; P Giamougiannis; E P Morris; J J Nieto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.