Literature DB >> 1505609

Modeling the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone in depressed patients.

S K Gupta1, J C Ritchie, E H Ellinwood, K Wiedemann, F Holsboer.   

Abstract

Changes in time course effected by cortisol suppression and the relationship of these changes to the plasma dexamethasone concentration of suppressor and non-suppressor patients are described in this report on a combined pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Thirteen depressed patients (8 suppressors and 5 non-suppressors) received an intravenous dose (1.5 mg) of dexamethasone. The drug-induced effect changes are found to lag behind, in time, the plasma drug level changes. To accurately relate the temporal relationship of effect changes to plasma dexamethasone levels, a pharmacodynamic model (sigmoid-Emax) was combined with a pharmacokinetic model that incorporated an effect compartment. The magnitude of the time-lag was quantified by the half-time of equilibration between concentrations in the hypothetical effect compartment and the plasma dexamethasone levels (t1/2keo). The t1/2keo of the nonsuppressing group was about 50% of that of the suppressing group, indicating that for a given plasma level the onset and termination of effect for the nonsuppressing group is about two times more rapid than for the suppressing group. Moreover, the model can estimate the effect-site concentration that causes one-half of the maximal predicted effect (EC50), a measure of an individual's sensitivity to dexamethasone. The receptor sensitivity (as determined from the EC50 ratio) of the suppressing group was about twice that of the nonsuppressing group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1505609     DOI: 10.1007/bf02280754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  17 in total

1.  Simultaneous modeling of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benzodiazepines. I: Lorazepam.

Authors:  S K Gupta; E H Ellinwood; A M Nikaido; D G Heatherly
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-04

2.  Association between low plasma levels of dexamethasone and elevated levels of cortisol in psychiatric patients given dexamethasone.

Authors:  G W Arana; R J Workman; R J Baldessarini
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  The effect of dosage on the dexamethasone suppression test in normal controls.

Authors:  A J Rush; M A Schlesser; D E Giles; G T Crowley; C Fairchild; K Z Altshuler
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-04

Review 5.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Dexamethasone kinetics in depressed patients before and after clinical response.

Authors:  K P Maguire; V M Tuckwell; I Schweitzer; J W Tiller; B M Davies
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  Neuroendocrine regulation in depression. I. Limbic system-adrenocortical dysfunction.

Authors:  G C Curtis; J Mendels
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-09

8.  The limited utility of the dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnostic process in psychiatry.

Authors:  M Berger; K M Pirke; P Doerr; J C Krieg; D von Zerssen
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and plasma dexamethasone levels in depressed patients.

Authors:  G F Johnson; G Hunt; K Kerr; I Caterson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Diagnosis of endogenous depression. Comparison of clinical, research and neuroendocrine criteria.

Authors:  B J Carroll; M Feinberg; J F Greden; R F Haskett; N M James; M Steiner; J Tarika
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Nonlinear dynamics in clinical pharmacology: the paradigm of cortisol secretion and suppression.

Authors:  Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Athanassios Iliadis; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Statistical approaches to pharmacodynamic modeling: motivations, methods, and misperceptions.

Authors:  R Mick; M J Ratain
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone after intravenous administration in camels: effect of dose.

Authors:  N A Al Katheeri; I A Wasfi; M Lambert; A Saeed
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids.

Authors:  David Czock; Frieder Keller; Franz Maximilian Rasche; Ulla Häussler
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Demographics, assessment and management of pain in the elderly.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Manish Srivastava
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.