Literature DB >> 15055895

Do we necessarily need local anaesthetics for venous cannulation? A comparison of different cannula sizes.

K D Röhm1, T A H Schöllhorn, M J Gwosdek, S N Piper, W H Maleck, J Boldt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: This randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a subcutaneous local anaesthetic infiltration prior to venepuncture using different cannula sizes.
METHODS: Three-hundred-and-one patients were included in the study, 150 received mepivacaine 1% (0.25 mL) subcutaneously, 151 were cannulated without local analgesia. Patients were further allocated to one of five cannula size groups (standard wire gauge (G)): 20-, 18-, 17-, 16- and 14-G. They were asked to quantify the pain experienced using a four-point rating scale.
RESULTS: In the group without local anaesthetics, 28.8% complained about pain compared to 12% receiving local analgesia. The incidence of pain for 14-G (10%) and 16-G (12.9%) cannulae was significantly reduced in the local analgesia group (P < 0.01) compared to no local analgesia (77.4% and 45.1%). Other cannula sizes showed no difference in pain whether using local analgesia or not.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients profit from a subcutaneous infiltration with mepivacaine 1% prior to intravenous cathetherization only when cannulae of size > or = 16-G are inserted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15055895     DOI: 10.1017/s0265021504003096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  1 in total

1.  The pain of venous cannulation.

Authors:  Michelle Petrou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.