Literature DB >> 15055504

Relationship of demographic variables on perception of fatigue and discomfort following prolonged standing under various flooring conditions.

Antonina R Orlando1, Phyllis M King.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that prolonged standing is associated with pain and discomfort experienced by assembly line workers and other occupations. In an attempt to alleviate these problems, companies have implemented ergonomic interventions which include alterations to the flooring conditions upon which workers stand. The purpose of this study was to investigate assembly line workers' perceptions of fatigue and discomfort associated with various body regions after standing for an 8-h shift on three different flooring conditions: (1) standing on a wood-block floor, (2) standing on a floor mat, and (3) wearing insoles. Eleven assembly line workers employed at a large Midwest manufacturing company participated in the study. They were exposed to one of three flooring conditions each Monday for 3 weeks during their 8-h work shift. A Latin Square research design was used to schedule participant rotation. Following their shift, participants answered a questionnaire inquiring about perceived firmness of the flooring condition, and perceived fatigue discomfort. Overall, this study found that the insoles and mat conditions appeared to decrease general fatigue, leg fatigue, and discomfort ratings. Moderately strong correlations were found for the variables of age, height, weight, and job tenure. Older participants and participants with more seniority experienced less discomfort while wearing insoles. Shorter subjects indicated higher scores of perceived firmness while standing on the wood-block floor and mat. No statistically significant differences were found between flooring condition and subjective ratings of fatigue or discomfort in various body regions. However, the insoles and mat conditions were perceived significantly softer than the wood-block floor condition. Insoles and mat conditions were also chosen significantly more often as conditions participants would use after the study when compared to the wood-block floor condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15055504     DOI: 10.1023/b:joor.0000015011.39875.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of the effects of floor mats and shoe in-soles on standing fatigue.

Authors:  Phyllis M King
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Subjective, physiological and biomechanical responses to prolonged manual work performed standing on hard and soft surfaces.

Authors:  P Madeleine; M Voigt; L Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998

3.  Effect of viscoelastic insoles on pain.

Authors:  R E Tooms; J W Griffin; S Green; K Cagle
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Assessment of some shock absorbing insoles.

Authors:  D J Pratt; P H Rees; C Rodgers
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Enhanced venous pump activity as a result of standing on a varied terrain floor surface.

Authors:  C R Brantingham; B E Beekman; C N Moss; R B Gordon
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1970-05

6.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson; W G Allread; S L Rajulu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Risk of back trouble in individual occupations in Denmark.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The relation between discomfort and postural loading at the joints.

Authors:  M Boussenna; E N Corlett; S T Pheasant
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The effects of mats on back and leg fatigue.

Authors:  J Y Kim; C Stuart-Buttle; W S Marras
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Shoe insoles in the workplace.

Authors:  J R Basford; M A Smith
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Two Types of Insoles on Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Plantar Pressure Distribution in a Work Environment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Josiane S Almeida; Franciele M Vanderlei; Eliane C Pastre; Rodrigo A D M Martins; Carlos R Padovani; Guaracy C Filho
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 2.  Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert B Dick
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.625

3.  Comparison of workers' perceptions toward work climate and health symptoms between ceramic and iron foundry workers.

Authors:  Joydeep Majumder; Bhavani S Bagepally; Priyanka Shah; Sanjay Kotadiya; Suresh Yadav; Nibedita Naha
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

4.  The Effect of Standing Mats on Biomechanical Characteristics of Lower Limbs and Perceived Exertion for Healthy Individuals during Prolonged Standing.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yining Xu; Zixiang Gao; Hongjun Yan; Jianshe Li; Yichen Lu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  An explorative qualitative study to determine the footwear needs of workers in standing environments.

Authors:  Jennifer Anderson; Anita E Williams; Christopher Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.303

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.